GEMCITABINE- gemcitabine injection, solution
BluePoint Laboratories
----------
HIGHLIGHTS OF PRESCRIBING INFORMATIONThese highlights do not include all the information needed to use GEMCITABINE INJECTION safely and effectively. See full prescribing information for GEMCITABINE INJECTION.
GEMCITABINE injection, for intravenous use Initial U.S. Approval: 1996 RECENT MAJOR CHANGES
Warnings and Precautions, Hemolytic Uremic Syndrome (5.4) INDICATIONS AND USAGEGemcitabine Injection is a nucleoside metabolic inhibitor indicated:
DOSAGE AND ADMINISTRATIONGemcitabine Injection is for intravenous infusion use only.
DOSAGE FORMS AND STRENGTHSCONTRAINDICATIONSPatients with a known hypersensitivity to gemcitabine. ( 4) WARNINGS AND PRECAUTIONS
ADVERSE REACTIONSThe most common adverse reactions for the single agent (≥20%) are nausea/vomiting, anemia, increased aspartate aminotransferase (AST), increased alanine aminotransferase (ALT), neutropenia, increased alkaline phosphatase, proteinuria, fever, hematuria, rash, thrombocytopenia, dyspnea, and edema. ( 6.1) To report SUSPECTED ADVERSE REACTIONS, contact Accord Healthcare Inc. at 1-866-941-7875 or FDA at 1-800-FDA-1088 or www.fda.gov/medwatch See 17 for PATIENT COUNSELING INFORMATION. Revised: 9/2019 |
Gemcitabine Injection in combination with carboplatin is indicated for the treatment of patients with advanced ovarian cancer that has relapsed at least 6 months after completion of platinum-based therapy.
Gemcitabine Injection in combination with paclitaxel is indicated for the first-line treatment of patients with metastatic breast cancer after failure of prior anthracycline-containing adjuvant chemotherapy, unless anthracyclines were clinically contraindicated.
Recommended Dose and Schedule
The recommended dosage of Gemcitabine Injection is 1000 mg/m 2intravenously over 30 minutes on Days 1 and 8 of each 21-day cycle, in combination with carboplatin AUC 4 administered intravenously on Day 1 after Gemcitabine Injection administration. Refer to the carboplatin prescribing information for additional information.
Dose Modifications
Recommended Gemcitabine Injection dose modifications for myelosuppression are described in Table 1and Table 2[see Warnings and Precautions ( 5.2)]. Refer to the dose modification recommendations for non-hematologic adverse reactions [see Dosage and Administration ( 2.5)].
Treatment Day |
Absolute neutrophil count
|
Platelet count (x 10 6/L) |
Dose modification |
|
Day 1 |
Greater than or equal to 1500
Less than 1500 |
and
or |
Greater than or equal to 100,000
|
None
Delay Treatment Cycle |
Day 8 |
Greater than or equal to 1500
1000-1499
|
and
or
|
Greater than or equal to 100,000
|
None
50% of full dose
|
Occurrence |
Myelosuppression During Treatment Cycle |
Dose Modification |
Initial Occurrence |
Absolute neutrophil count less than500 x 10
6/L for more than 5 days or
|
Permanently reduce Gemcitabine Injection dose to 800 mg/m 2on Days 1 and 8 |
Subsequent Occurrence |
If any of the above toxicities occur after the initial dose reduction |
Permanently reduce Gemcitabine Injection to 800 mg/m 2on Day 1 only |
Recommended Dose and Schedule
The recommended dosage of Gemcitabine Injection is 1250 mg/m 2intravenously over 30 minutes on Days 1 and 8 of each 21-day cycle in combination with paclitaxel 175 mg/m 2administered as a 3-hour intravenous infusion on Day 1 before Gemcitabine Injection administration. Refer to the paclitaxel prescribing information for additional information.
Dosage Modifications
Recommended Gemcitabine Injection dose modifications for myelosuppression are described in Table 3[see Warnings and Precautions ( 5.2)]. Refer to the recommended dosage modifications for non-hematologic adverse reactions [see Dosage and Administration ( 2.5)].
Treatment Day |
Absolute neutrophil count
|
Platelet count
|
Dose modification |
|
Day 1 |
Greater than or equal to 1500 |
and |
Greater than or equal to 100,000 |
None |
Less than 1500 |
or |
Less than 100,000 |
Hold |
|
Day 8 |
Greater than or equal to 1200 |
and |
Greater than 75,000 |
None |
1000-1199 |
or |
50,000-75,000 |
75% of full dose |
|
700-999 |
and |
Greater than or equal to 50,000 |
50% of full dose |
|
Less than 700 |
or |
Less than 50,000 |
Hold |
Recommended Dose and Schedule
28-day schedule
The recommended dosage of Gemcitabine Injection is 1000 mg/m 2intravenously over 30 minutes on Days 1, 8, and 15 of each 28-day cycle in combination with cisplatin 100 mg/m 2administered intravenously on Day 1 after Gemcitabine Injection administration.
21-day schedule
The recommended dosage of Gemcitabine Injection is 1250 mg/m 2intravenously over 30 minutes on Days 1 and 8 of each 21-day cycle in combination with cisplatin 100 mg/m 2therapy administered intravenously on Day 1 after Gemcitabine Injection administration.
Refer to the cisplatin prescribing information for additional information.
Recommended Dose and Schedule
The recommended dose of Gemcitabine Injection is 1000 mg/m 2over 30 minutes intravenously. The recommended treatment schedule is as follows:
Dosage Modifications
Recommended dosage modifications for Gemcitabine Injection for myelosuppression are described in Table 4 [see Warnings and Precautions ( 5.2)]. Refer to the recommended dosage modifications for non-hematologic adverse reactions [see Dosage and Administration ( 2.5)].
If myelosuppression is detected, therapy should be modified or suspended according to the guidelines in Table 4.
Absolute neutrophil count
|
Platelet count
|
Dose modification |
|
Greater than or equal to 1000 |
and |
Greater than or equal to 100,000 |
None |
500-999 |
or |
50,000-99,999 |
75% of full dose |
Less than 500 |
or |
Less than 50,000 |
Hold |
Permanently discontinue Gemcitabine Injection for any of the following:
Withhold Gemcitabine Injection or reduce dose by 50% for other Grade 3 or 4 non-hematological adverse reactions until resolved. No dose modifications are recommended for alopecia, nausea, or vomiting.
Gemcitabine Injection is a cytotoxic drug. Follow applicable special handling and disposal procedures. 1
Exercise caution and wear gloves when preparing Gemcitabine Injection solutions. Immediately wash the skin thoroughly or rinse the mucosa with copious amounts of water if Gemcitabine Injection contacts the skin or mucus membranes. Death has occurred in animal studies due to dermal absorption.
Preparation
After dilution with 0.9% Sodium Chloride Injection, inspect the diluted Gemcitabine injection solution visually for particulate matter and discoloration. Discard if particulate matter or discoloration is found.
Storage
Administration
Injection: 100mg/mL of gemcitabine as a clear, colorless to pale yellow solution available in sterile multiple-dose vials containing
Gemcitabine Injection is contraindicated in patients with a known hypersensitivity to gemcitabine. Reactions include anaphylaxis [see Adverse Reactions ( 6.1)].
In clinical trials evaluating the maximum tolerated dose of gemcitabine, prolongation of the infusion time beyond 60 minutes or more frequent than weekly dosing resulted in an increased incidence of clinically significant hypotension, severe flu-like symptoms, myelosuppression, and asthenia. The half-life of gemcitabine is influenced by the length of the infusion [see Clinical Pharmacology ( 12.3)] . [Refer to the recommended Gemcitabine Injection dosing schedule [see Dosage and Administration ( 2.1, 2.2, 2.3, and 2.4)]. ]
Myelosuppression manifested by neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, and anemia occurs with gemcitabine as a single agent and the risks are increased when gemcitabine is combined with other cytotoxic drugs. In clinical trials, Grade 3-4 neutropenia, anemia, and thrombocytopenia occurred in 25%, 8%, and 5%, respectively of the 979 patients who received single-agent gemcitabine. The frequencies of Grade 3-4 neutropenia, anemia, and thrombocytopenia varied from 48% to 71%, 8% to 28%, and 5% to 55%, respectively, in patients receiving gemcitabine in combination with another drug [see Adverse Reactions ( 6.1)]. Prior to each dose of Gemcitabine Injection, obtain a complete blood count (CBC), with a differential and a platelet count. Modify the Gemcitabine Injection dosage as recommended [see Dosage and Administration ( 2.1, 2.2, 2.3, and 2.4)] .
Pulmonary toxicity, including interstitial pneumonitis, pulmonary fibrosis, pulmonary edema, and adult respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), has been reported. In some cases, these pulmonary events can lead to fatal respiratory failure despite discontinuation of therapy. The onset of pulmonary symptoms may occur up to 2 weeks after the last dose of gemcitabine [see Adverse Reactions ( 6.1, 6.2)] .
Permanently discontinue Gemcitabine Injection in patients who develop unexplained dyspnea, with or without bronchospasm, or have any evidence of pulmonary toxicity.
Hemolytic uremic syndrome (HUS), including fatalities from renal failure or the requirement for dialysis, can occur with gemcitabine. In clinical trials, HUS occurred in 0.25% of 2429 patients. Most fatal cases of renal failure were due to HUS [see Adverse Reactions ( 6.1)] . Serious cases of thrombotic microangiopathy (TMA) other than HUS have been reported with gemcitabine [see Adverse Reactions ( 6.2)].
Assess renal function prior to initiation of Gemcitabine Injection and periodically during treatment. Consider the diagnosis of HUS in patients who develop anemia with evidence of microangiopathic hemolysis; increased bilirubin or LDH; reticulocytosis; severe thrombocytopenia; or renal failure (increased serum creatinine or BUN). Permanently discontinue Gemcitabine Injection in patients with HUS or severe renal impairment. Renal failure may not be reversible even with discontinuation of therapy.
Drug-induced liver injury, including liver failure and death, has been reported in patients receiving gemcitabine alone or in combination with other potentially hepatotoxic drugs [see Adverse Reactions ( 6.1and 6.2)] . Administration of gemcitabine in patients with concurrent hepatic metastases or a pre-existing medical history or hepatitis, alcoholism, or liver cirrhosis can lead to exacerbation of the underlying hepatic insufficiency.
Assess hepatic function prior to initiation of Gemcitabine Injection and periodically during treatment. Permanently discontinue Gemcitabine Injection in patients that develop severe liver injury.
Based on animal data and its mechanism of action Gemcitabine Injection can cause fetal harm when administered to a pregnant woman. Gemcitabine was teratogenic, embryotoxic, and fetotoxic in mice and rabbits. Advise pregnant women of the potential risk to a fetus. Advise females of reproductive potential to use effective contraception during treatment with Gemcitabine Injection and for 6 months after the final dose. Advise male patients with female partners of reproductive potential to use effective contraception during treatment and for 3 months following the final dose [see Use in Specific Populations ( 8.1), ( 8.3)] .
Gemcitabine is not recommended for use in combination with radiation therapy.
Concurrent (given together or ≤7 days apart)
Life-threatening mucositis, especially esophagitis and pneumonitis occurred in a trial in which gemcitabine was administered at a dose of 1000 mg/m 2to patients with non-small cell lung cancer for up to 6 consecutive weeks concurrently with thoracic radiation.
Capillary leak syndrome (CLS) with severe consequences has been reported in patients receiving gemcitabine as a single agent or in combination with other chemotherapeutic agents [see Adverse Reactions ( 6.2)] . Permanently discontinue Gemcitabine Injection if CLS develops during therapy.
Posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome (PRES) has been reported in patients receiving gemcitabine as a single agent or in combination with other chemotherapeutic agents [see Adverse Reactions ( 6.2)] . PRES can present with headache, seizure, lethargy, hypertension, confusion, blindness, and other visual and neurologic disturbances.
Confirm the diagnosis of PRES with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Permanently discontinue Gemcitabine Injection if PRES develops during therapy.
The following clinically significant adverse reactions are described elsewhere in the labeling:
Because clinical trials are conducted under widely varying conditions, adverse reaction rates observed in the clinical trials of a drug cannot be directly compared to rates in the clinical trials of another drug and may not reflect the rates observed in clinical practice.
Single-Agent
The data described below reflect exposure to gemcitabine as a single agent administered at doses between 800 mg/m 2to 1250 mg/m 2intravenously over 30 minutes once weekly in 979 patients with various malignancies. The most common (≥20%) adverse reactions of single-agent gemcitabine are nausea/vomiting, anemia, increased alanine aminotransferase (ALT), increased aspartate aminotransferase (AST), neutropenia, increased alkaline phosphatase, proteinuria, fever, hematuria, rash, thrombocytopenia, dyspnea, and edema. The most common (≥5%) Grade 3 or 4 adverse reactions were neutropenia, nausea/vomiting; increased ALT, increased alkaline phosphatase, anemia, increased AST, and thrombocytopenia. Approximately 10% of the 979 patients discontinued gemcitabine due to adverse reactions. Adverse reactions resulting in discontinuation of gemcitabine in 2% of 979 patients were cardiovascular adverse reactions (myocardial infarction, cerebrovascular accident, arrhythmia, and hypertension) and adverse reactions resulting in discontinuation of gemcitabine in < 1% of the 979 patients were anemia, thrombocytopenia, hepatic dysfunction, renal dysfunction, nausea/vomiting, fever, rash, dyspnea, hemorrhage, infection, stomatitis, somnolence, flu-like syndrome, and edema.
Tables 5and 6 present the incidence of selected adverse reactions and laboratory abnormalities reported in patients with various malignancies receiving single agent gemcitabine across 5 clinical trials. Additional clinically significant adverse reactions and laboratory abnormalities are provided following Table 6.
Adverse Reactions b | Gemcitabine c | ||
---|---|---|---|
All Grades (%) | Grade 3 (%) | Grade 4 (%) | |
aGrade based on criteria from the World Health Organization (WHO). | |||
bFor approximately 60% of patients, non-laboratory adverse reactions were graded only if assessed to be possibly drug-related. | |||
cN=699-974; all patients with laboratory or non-laboratory data. | |||
Nausea and vomiting |
69 |
13 |
1 |
Fever |
41 |
2 |
0 |
Rash |
30 |
<1 |
0 |
Dyspnea |
23 |
3 |
<1 |
Diarrhea |
19 |
1 |
0 |
Hemorrhage |
17 |
<1 |
<1 |
Infection |
16 |
1 |
<1 |
Alopecia |
15 |
<1 |
0 |
Stomatitis |
11 |
<1 |
0 |
Somnolence |
11 |
<1 |
<1 |
Paresthesias |
10 |
<1 |
0 |
Laboratory Abnormality b | Gemcitabine c | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
All Grades (%) | Grade 3 (%) | Grade 4 (%) | |||||
aGrade based on criteria from the WHO. | |||||||
bRegardless of causality. | |||||||
cN=699-974 ; all patients with laboratory or non-laboratory data. | |||||||
Hematologic | |||||||
Anemia |
68 |
7 |
1 |
||||
Neutropenia |
63 |
19 |
6 |
||||
Thrombocytopenia |
24 |
4 |
1 |
||||
Hepatic | |||||||
Increased ALT |
68 |
8 |
2 |
||||
Increased AST |
67 |
6 |
2 |
||||
Increased alkaline phosphatase |
55 |
7 |
2 |
||||
Hyperbilirubinemia |
13 |
2 |
<1 |
||||
Renal | |||||||
Proteinuria |
45 |
<1 |
0 |
||||
Hematuria |
35 |
<1 |
0 |
||||
Increased BUN |
16 |
0 |
0 |
||||
Increased creatinine |
8 |
<1 |
0 |
Additional adverse reactions include the following:
Ovarian Cancer
Tables 7and 8present the incidence of selected adverse reactions and laboratory abnormalities, occurring in ≥10% of gemcitabine-treated patients and at a higher incidence in the gemcitabine with carboplatin arm, reported in a randomized trial (Study 1) of gemcitabine plus carboplatin (n=175) compared to carboplatin alone (n=174) for the second-line treatment of ovarian cancer in women with disease that had relapsed more than 6 months following first-line platinum-based chemotherapy [see Clinical Studies ( 14.1)] .
Additional clinically significant adverse reactions, occurring in < 10% of patients, are provided following Table 8.
The proportion of patients with dose adjustments for carboplatin (1.8% versus 3.8%), doses of carboplatin omitted (0.2% versus 0) and discontinuing treatment for adverse reactions (11% versus 10%), were similar between arms. Dose adjustment for gemcitabine occurred in 10% of patients and gemcitabine dose was omitted in 14% of patients in the gemcitabine/ carboplatin arm.
Table 7: Adverse Reactions Occurring >10% of Patients Receiving Gemcitabine with Carboplatin and at Higher Incidence than in Patients Receiving Single Agent Carboplatin [Between Arm Difference of ≥5% (All Grades) or ≥2% (Grades 3-4)] in Study 1 a
aGrade based on National Cancer Institute CTC Version 2.0. | ||||||
bRegardless of causality. | ||||||
Adverse Reactions b |
Gemcitabine/ Carboplatin
|
Carboplatin
|
||||
All Grades (%) |
Grade 3 (%) |
Grade 4 (%) |
All Grades (%) |
Grade 3 (%) |
Grade 4 (%) |
|
Nausea |
69 |
6 |
0 |
61 |
3 |
0 |
Alopecia |
49 |
0 |
0 |
17 |
0 |
0 |
Vomiting |
46 |
6 |
0 |
36 |
2 |
<1 |
Constipation |
42 |
6 |
1 |
37 |
3 |
0 |
Fatigue |
40 |
3 |
<1 |
32 |
5 |
0 |
Diarrhea |
25 |
3 |
0 |
14 |
<1 |
0 |
Stomatitis/pharyngitis |
22 |
<1 |
0 |
13 |
0 |
0 |
Table 8: Laboratory Abnormalities Occurring in Patients Receiving Gemcitabine with Carboplatin and at Higher Incidence than in Patients Receiving Single Agent Carboplatin [Between Arm Difference of ≥5% (All Grades) or ≥2% (Grades 3-4)]
aGrade based on National Cancer Institute CTC Version 2.0. | |||||||||||||
bRegardless of causality. | |||||||||||||
cPercent of patients receiving a transfusion. Transfusions are not CTC-graded events. Blood transfusions included both packed red blood cells and whole blood. | |||||||||||||
Laboratory Abnormality b |
Gemcitabine/ Carboplatin
|
Carboplatin
|
|||||||||||
All Grades (%) |
Grade 3 (%) |
Grade 4 (%) |
All Grades (%) |
Grade 3 (%) |
Grade 4 (%) |
||||||||
Hematologic | |||||||||||||
Neutropenia |
90 |
42 |
29 |
58 |
11 |
1 |
|||||||
Anemia |
86 |
22 |
6 |
75 |
9 |
2 |
|||||||
Thrombocytopenia |
78 |
30 |
5 |
57 |
10 |
1 |
|||||||
RBC Transfusions c |
38 |
- |
- |
15 |
- |
- |
|||||||
Platelet Transfusions c |
9 |
- |
- |
3 |
- |
- |
Hematopoietic growth factors were administered more frequently in the gemcitabine-containing arm: leukocyte growth factor (24% and 10%) and erythropoiesis agents (7% and 3.9%). The following clinically relevant, Grade 3 and 4 adverse reactions occurred more frequently in the gemcitabine with carboplatin arm: dyspnea (3.4% versus 2.9%), febrile neutropenia (1.1% versus 0), hemorrhagic event (2.3% versus 1.1 %), motor neuropathy (1.1% versus 0.6%), and rash/desquamation (0.6% versus 0).
Breast Cancer
Table 9and 10 present the incidence of selected adverse reactions, and laboratory abnormalities, occurring in ≥10% of gemcitabine treated patients and at a higher incidence in the gemcitabine plus paclitaxel arm, reported in a randomized trial (Study 2) of gemcitabine with paclitaxel (n=262) compared to paclitaxel alone (n=259) for the first-line treatment of metastatic breast cancer (MBC) in women who received anthracycline-containing chemotherapy in the adjuvant/neo-adjuvant setting or for whom anthracyclines were contraindicated [see Clinical Studies ( 14.2)] . Additional clinically significant adverse reactions, occurring in <10% of patients, are provided following Table 10.
The requirement for dose reduction of paclitaxel were higher for patients in the gemcitabine/paclitaxel arm (5% versus 2%). The number of paclitaxel doses omitted (<1%), the proportion of patients discontinuing treatment adverse reactions (7% versus 5%), and the number of treatment-related deaths (1 patient in each arm) were similar between the two arms.
aGrade based on National Cancer Institute CTC Version 2.0. | ||||||
bNon-laboratory events were graded only if assessed to be possibly drug-related. | ||||||
Adverse Reactions b |
Gemcitabine/Paclitaxel (N=262) |
Paclitaxel (N=259) |
||||
All Grades
|
Grade 3
|
Grade 4
|
All Grades
|
Grade 3
|
Grade 4
|
|
Alopecia |
90 |
14 |
4 |
92 |
19 |
3 |
Neuropathy-sensory |
64 |
5 |
<1 |
58 |
3 |
0 |
Nausea |
50 |
1 |
0 |
31 |
2 |
0 |
Fatigue |
40 |
6 |
<1 |
28 |
1 |
<1 |
Vomiting |
29 |
2 |
0 |
15 |
2 |
0 |
Diarrhea |
20 |
3 |
0 |
13 |
2 |
0 |
Anorexia |
17 |
0 |
0 |
12 |
<1 |
0 |
Neuropathy-motor |
15 |
2 |
<1 |
10 |
<1 |
0 |
Stomatitis/pharyngitis |
13 |
1 |
<1 |
8 |
<1 |
0 |
Fever |
13 |
<1 |
0 |
3 |
0 |
0 |
Rash/desquamation |
11 |
<1 |
<1 |
5 |
0 |
0 |
Febrile neutropenia |
6 |
5 |
<1 |
2 |
1 |
0 |
aGrade based on National Cancer Institute CTC Version 2.0. | |||||||||||||
bRegardless of causality. | |||||||||||||
Laboratory
|
Gemcitabine/ Paclitaxel (N=262) |
Paclitaxel (N=259) |
|||||||||||
All Grades
|
Grade 3
|
Grade 4
|
All Grades
|
Grade 3
|
Grade 4
|
||||||||
Hematologic | |||||||||||||
Anemia |
69 |
6 |
1 |
51 |
3 |
<1 |
|||||||
Neutropenia |
69 |
31 |
17 |
31 |
4 |
7 |
|||||||
Thrombocytopenia |
26 |
5 |
<1 |
7 |
<1 |
<1 |
|||||||
Hepatobiliary | |||||||||||||
Increased ALT |
18 |
5 |
<1 |
6 |
<1 |
0 |
|||||||
Increased AST |
16 |
2 |
0 |
5 |
<1 |
0 |
Clinically relevant Grade 3 or 4 dyspnea occurred with a higher incidence in the gemcitabine with paclitaxel arm compared with the paclitaxel arm (1.9% versus 0).
Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer:
Table 11and 12present the incidence of selected adverse reactions and laboratory abnormalities occurring in ≥10% of gemcitabine-treated patients and at a higher incidence in the gemcitabine with cisplatin arm, reported in a randomized trial (Study 3) of gemcitabine with cisplatin (n=260) administered in 28-day cycles as compared to cisplatin alone (n=262) in patients receiving first-line treatment for locally advanced or metastatic NSCLC [see Clinical Studies ( 14.3)] .
Patients randomized to gemcitabine with cisplatin received a median of 4 cycles of treatment and those randomized to cisplatin alone received a median of 2 cycles of treatment. In this trial, the requirement for dose adjustments (>90% versus 16%), discontinuation of treatment for adverse reactions (15% versus 8%), and the proportion of patients hospitalized (36% versus 23%) were all higher for patients receiving gemcitabine with cisplatin compared to those receiving cisplatin alone. The incidence of febrile neutropenia (3% versus <1%), sepsis (4% versus 1%), Grade 3 cardiac dysrhythmias (3% versus <1%) were all higher in the gemcitabine with cisplatin arm compared to the cisplatin alone arm. The two-drug combination was more myelosuppressive with 4 (1.5%) possibly treatment-related deaths, including 3 resulting from myelosuppression with infection and one case of renal failure associated with pancytopenia and infection. No deaths due to treatment were reported on the cisplatin arm.
Table 11: Selected Adverse Reactions Occurring in ≥10% of Patients Receiving Gemcitabine with Cisplatin and at Higher Incidence than in Patients Receiving Single-Agent Cisplatin [Between Arm Difference of ≥5% (All Grades) or ≥2% (Grades 3-4)] in Study 3 a
aGrade based on National Cancer Institute Common Toxicity Criteria (CTC). | ||||||
bNon-laboratory events were graded only if assessed to be possibly drug-related. | ||||||
cN=217-253; all gemcitabine/ cisplatin patients with laboratory or non-laboratory data | ||||||
dN=213-248; all cisplatin patients with laboratory or non-laboratory data. | ||||||
Adverse Reactions b |
Gemcitabine/ Cisplatin
c
|
Cisplatin
d
|
||||
All Grades
|
Grade 3
|
Grade 4
|
All Grades
|
Grade 3
|
Grade 4
|
|
Nausea |
93 |
25 |
2 |
87 |
20 |
<1 |
Vomiting |
78 |
11 |
12 |
71 |
10 |
9 |
Alopecia |
53 |
1 |
0 |
33 |
0 |
0 |
Neuro-motor |
35 |
12 |
0 |
15 |
3 |
0 |
Diarrhea |
24 |
2 |
2 |
13 |
0 |
0 |
Neuro sensory |
23 |
1 |
0 |
18 |
1 |
0 |
Infection |
18 |
3 |
2 |
12 |
1 |
0 |
Fever |
16 |
0 |
0 |
5 |
0 |
0 |
Neuro cortical |
16 |
3 |
1 |
9 |
1 |
0 |
Neuro mood |
16 |
1 |
0 |
10 |
1 |
0 |
Local |
15 |
0 |
0 |
6 |
0 |
0 |
Neuro headache |
14 |
0 |
0 |
7 |
0 |
0 |
Stomatitis |
14 |
1 |
0 |
5 |
0 |
0 |
Hemorrhage |
14 |
1 |
0 |
4 |
0 |
0 |
Hypotension |
12 |
1 |
0 |
7 |
1 |
0 |
Rash |
11 |
0 |
0 |
3 |
0 |
0 |
Table 12: Selected Laboratory Abnormalities Occurring in >10% of Patients Receiving Gemcitabine with Cisplatin at Higher Incidence than in Patients Receiving Single-Agent Cisplatin [Between Arm Difference of ≥5% (All Grades) or ≥2% (Grades 3-4)] in Study 3
aGrade based on National Cancer Institute CTC. | |||||||||||||
bRegardless of causality. | |||||||||||||
cN=217-253; all gemcitabine/ cisplatin patients with laboratory or non-laboratory. | |||||||||||||
dN=213-248; all cisplatin patients with laboratory or non-laboratory data. | |||||||||||||
ePercent of patients receiving a transfusion. Percent transfusions are not CTC-graded events. | |||||||||||||
Laboratory Abnormality b |
Gemcitabine/ Cisplatin
c
|
Cisplatin
d
|
|||||||||||
All Grades
|
Grade 3
|
Grade 4
|
All Grades
|
Grade 3
|
Grade 4
|
||||||||
Hematologic | |||||||||||||
Anemia |
89 |
22 |
3 |
67 |
6 |
1 |
|||||||
Thrombocytopenia |
85 |
25 |
25 |
13 |
3 |
1 |
|||||||
Neutropenia |
79 |
22 |
35 |
20 |
3 |
1 |
|||||||
Lymphopenia |
75 |
25 |
18 |
51 |
12 |
5 |
|||||||
RBC transfusions e |
39 |
- |
- |
13 |
- |
- |
|||||||
Platelet transfusions e |
21 |
- |
- |
<1 |
- |
- |
|||||||
Renal | |||||||||||||
Increased creatinine |
38 |
4 |
<1 |
31 |
2 |
<1 |
|||||||
Proteinuria |
23 |
0 |
0 |
18 |
0 |
0 |
|||||||
Hematuria |
15 |
0 |
0 |
13 |
0 |
0 |
|||||||
Other laboratory | |||||||||||||
Hyperglycemia |
30 |
4 |
0 |
23 |
3 |
0 |
|||||||
Hypomagnesemia |
30 |
4 |
3 |
17 |
2 |
0 |
|||||||
Hypocalcemia |
18 |
2 |
0 |
7 |
0 |
<1 |
|||||||
Hepatic | |||||||||||||
Increased transaminases |
22 |
2 |
1 |
10 |
1 |
0 |
|||||||
Increased alkaline Phosphatase |
19 |
1 |
0 |
13 |
0 |
0 |
Tables 13 and 14present the incidence of selected adverse reactions and laboratory abnormalities occurring in ≥10% of gemcitabine-treated patients and at a higher incidence in the gemcitabine with cisplatin arm, reported in a randomized trial (Study 4) of gemcitabine with cisplatin (n=69) administered in 21-day cycles as compared to etoposide with cisplatin (n=66) in patients receiving first-line treatment for locally advanced or metastatic NSCLC [see Clinical Studies ( 14.3)] . Additional clinically significant adverse reactions are provided following Table 14.
Patients in the gemcitabine/ cisplatin (GC) arm received a median of 5 cycles and those in the etoposide/ cisplatin (EC) arm received a median of 4 cycles. The majority of patients receiving more than one cycle of treatment required dose adjustments; 81% in the (GC) arm and 68% in the (EC) arm. The incidence of hospitalizations for adverse reactions was 22% in the GC arm and 27% in the EC arm. The proportion of patients who discontinued treatment for adverse reactions was higher in the GC arm (14% versus 8%). The proportion of patients who were hospitalized for febrile neutropenia was lower in the GC arm (7% versus 12%). There was one death attributed to treatment, a patient with febrile neutropenia and renal failure, which occurred in the GC arm.
Table 13: Selected Adverse Reactions in Patients Receiving Gemcitabine with Cisplatin in Study 4 a
aGrade based on criteria from the World Health Organization (WHO). | ||||||||||||||||||||
bNon-laboratory events were graded only if assessed to be possibly drug-related. | ||||||||||||||||||||
cN=67-69; all gemcitabine/ cisplatin patients with non-laboratory data. | ||||||||||||||||||||
dN=57-63; all cisplatin plus etoposide patients with non-laboratory data. | ||||||||||||||||||||
eFlu-like syndrome and edema were not graded. | ||||||||||||||||||||
Adverse Reactions d |
Gemcitabine/ Cisplatin c |
Etoposide/ Cisplatin d |
||||||||||||||||||
All Grades
|
Grade 3
|
Grade 4
|
All Grades
|
Grade 3
|
Grade 4
|
|||||||||||||||
Nausea and Vomiting |
96 |
35 |
4 |
86 |
19 |
7 |
||||||||||||||
Alopecia |
77 |
13 |
0 |
92 |
51 |
0 |
||||||||||||||
Paresthesias |
38 |
0 |
0 |
16 |
2 |
0 |
||||||||||||||
Infection |
28 |
3 |
1 |
21 |
8 |
0 |
||||||||||||||
Stomatitis |
20 |
4 |
0 |
18 |
2 |
0 |
||||||||||||||
Diarrhea |
14 |
1 |
1 |
13 |
0 |
2 |
||||||||||||||
Edema e |
12 |
- |
- |
2 |
- |
- |
||||||||||||||
Rash |
10 |
0 |
0 |
3 |
0 |
0 |
||||||||||||||
Hemorrhage |
9 |
0 |
3 |
3 |
0 |
3 |
||||||||||||||
Fever |
6 |
0 |
0 |
3 |
0 |
0 |
||||||||||||||
Flu-like syndrome e |
3 |
- |
- |
0 |
- |
- |
||||||||||||||
Somnolence |
3 |
0 |
0 |
3 |
2 |
0 |
||||||||||||||
Dyspnea |
1 |
0 |
1 |
3 |
0 |
0 |
aGrade based on criteria from the WHO. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
bRegardless of causality. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
cN=67-69; all gemcitabine/ cisplatin patients with laboratory or non-laboratory data. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
dN=57-63; all cisplatin/ etoposide patients with laboratory or non-laboratory data. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
eWHO grading scale not applicable to proportion of patients with transfusions. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Laboratory Abnormalities d |
Gemcitabine/ Cisplatin c |
Etoposide/ Cisplatin d |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
All Grades
|
Grade 3
|
Grade 4
|
All Grades
|
Grade 3
|
Grade 4
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
Hematologic | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Anemia |
88 |
22 |
0 |
77 |
13 |
2 |
|||||||||||||||||||||
RBC Transfusions e |
29 |
- |
- |
21 |
- |
- |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Neutropenia |
88 |
36 |
28 |
87 |
20 |
56 |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Thrombocytopenia |
81 |
39 |
16 |
45 |
8 |
5 |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Platelet Transfusions e |
3 |
- |
- |
8 |
- |
- |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Hepatic | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Increased ALT |
6 |
0 |
0 |
12 |
0 |
0 |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Increased AST |
3 |
0 |
0 |
11 |
0 |
0 |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Increased alkaline |
16 |
0 |
0 |
11 |
0 |
0 |
|||||||||||||||||||||
phosphatase | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Renal | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Proteinuria |
12 |
0 |
0 |
5 |
0 |
0 |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Hematuria |
22 |
0 |
0 |
10 |
0 |
0 |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Increased BUN |
6 |
0 |
0 |
4 |
0 |
0 |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Increased Creatinine |
2 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
0 |
0 |
The following adverse reactions have been identified during post-approval use of gemcitabine. Because these reactions are reported voluntarily from a population of uncertain size, it is not always possible to reliably estimate their frequency or establish a causal relationship to drug exposure.
Blood and Lymphatic System:TMA
Cardiovascular— congestive heart failure, myocardial infarction, arrhythmias, supraventricular arrhythmias
Vascular Disorders— peripheral vasculitis, gangrene, and capillary leak syndrome
Skin— cellulitis, pseudocellulitis, severe skin reactions, including desquamation and bullous skin eruptions
Hepatic— hepatic failure, hepatic veno-occlusive disease
Pulmonary— interstitial pneumonitis, pulmonary fibrosis, pulmonary edema, adult respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), pulmonary eosinophilia
Nervous System— posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome (PRES)
Risk Summary
Based on animal data and its mechanism of action, Gemcitabine Injection can cause fetal harm when administered to a pregnant woman [see Clinical Pharmacology ( 12.1)] . There are no available data on the use of gemcitabine in pregnant women. In animal reproductive studies, gemcitabine was teratogenic, embryotoxic, and fetotoxic in mice and rabbits [see Data]. Advise pregnant women of the potential risk to a fetus [see Use in Special Populations( 8.3)].
In the U.S. general population, the estimated background risk of major birth defects and miscarriage in clinically recognized pregnancies is 2-4% and 15-20%, respectively.
Data
Animal Data
Gemcitabine is embryotoxic in mice. Daily dosing of gemcitabine to pregnant mice increased the incidence of fetal malformation (cleft palate, incomplete ossification) at doses of 1.5 mg/kg/day in mice [approximately 0.005 times the 1000 mg/m 2clinical dose based on body surface area (BSA)]. Gemcitabine was embryotoxic and fetotoxic in rabbits. Daily dosing of gemcitabine to pregnant rabbits resulted in fetotoxicity (decreased fetal viability, reduced litter sizes, and developmental delays) and increased the incidence of fetal malformations (fused pulmonary artery, absence of gall bladder) at doses of 0.1 mg/kg/day (approximately 0.002 times the 1000 mg/m 2clinical dose based on BSA)
Risk Summary
There is no information regarding the presence of gemcitabine or its metabolites in human milk, or their effects on the breastfed infant or on milk production. Due to the potential for serious adverse reactions in breastfed infants, advise a women not to breastfeed during treatment with Gemcitabine Injection and for one week following the last dose.
Pregnancy Testing
Verify pregnancy status in females of reproductive potential prior to initiating Gemcitabine Injection [see Use in Specific Populations (8.1)].
Contraception
Gemcitabine Injection can cause fetal harm when administered to a pregnant woman [see Use in Specific Populations (8.1)].
Females
Because of the potential for genotoxicity, advise females of reproductive potential to use effective contraception during treatment with Gemcitabine Injection and for 6 months after the final dose .
Males
Because of the potential for genotoxicity, advise males with female partners of reproductive potential to use effective contraception during treatment and for 3 months following the final dose of [see Nonclinical Toxicology ( 13.1)].
Infertility
Males
Based on animal studies, Gemcitabine Injection may impair fertility in males of reproductive potential [see Nonclinical Toxicology ( 13.1)]. It is not known whether these effects on fertility are reversible.
The safety and effectiveness of gemcitabine have not been established in pediatric patients.
The safety and pharmacokinetics of gemcitabine were evaluated in a trial of pediatric patients with refractory leukaemia. The maximum tolerated dose was 10 mg/m 2/min for 360 minutes weekly for three weeks followed by a one-week rest period.
The safety and activity of gemcitabine were evaluated in a trial of pediatric patients with relapsed acute lymphoblastic leukemia (22 patients) and acute myelogenous leukemia (10 patients) at a dose of 10 mg/m 2/min administered over 360 minutes weekly for three weeks followed by a one-week rest period. Patients with M1 or M2 bone marrow on day 28 who did not experience unacceptable toxicity were eligible to receive a maximum of one additional four-week course. Toxicities observed included myelosuppression, febrile neutropenia, increased serum transaminases, nausea, and rash/desquamation. No meaningful clinical activity was observed in this trial.
In clinical studies which enrolled 979 patients with various malignancies who received single agent gemcitabine, no overall differences in safety were observed between patients aged 65 and older and younger patients, with the exception of a higher rate of Grade 3-4 thrombocytopenia in older patients compared to younger patients. In a randomized trial in women with ovarian cancer (Study 1), 175 women received gemcitabine with carboplatin, of which 29% were age 65 years or older. Similar effectiveness was observed between older and younger women. There was significantly higher Grade 3-4 neutropenia in women 65 years of age or older [see Dosage and Administration ( 2.1) ]. Gemcitabine clearance is affected by age; however, there are no recommended dose adjustments based on patients’ age [see Clinical Pharmacology ( 12.3)].
Gemcitabine clearance is decreased in females [see Clinical Pharmacology ( 12.3)] . In single-agent studies of gemcitabine, women, especially older women, were more likely not to proceed to a subsequent cycle and to experience Grade 3-4 neutropenia and thrombocytopenia [see Dosage and Administration ( 2.1, 2.2, 2.3, 2.4) ].
There is no known antidote for overdoses of gemcitabine. Myelosuppression, paresthesias, and severe rash were the principal toxicities seen when a single dose as high as 5700 mg/m 2was administered by intravenous infusion over 30 minutes every 2 weeks to several patients in a dose-escalation study. In the event of suspected overdose, monitor with appropriate blood counts and should receive supportive therapy, as necessary.
Gemcitabine is a nucleoside metabolic inhibitor. Gemcitabine Hydrochloride is 2’-deoxy-2’,2’-difluorocytidine monohydrochloride (β-isomer) with the following molecular structure:
Gemcitabine Hydrochloride is a white to off white crystalline powder. The empirical formula for gemcitabine hydrochloride is C 9H 11F 2N 3O 4• HCl and the molecular weight is 299.66.
Gemcitabine HCl is soluble in water, slightly soluble in methanol, and practically insoluble in ethanol and polar organic solvents.
Gemcitabine Injection is a sterile, clear colorless to pale yellow solution that is provided in 100mg/mL multiple-dose vials for intravenous use only. Gemcitabine Injection is available in four presentations: 200 mg/2 mL, 1 g/10 mL, 1.5 g/15 mL or 2 g/20 mL. Each mL contains 100 mg of gemcitabine free base (equivalent to 113.85 mg of gemcitabine hydrochloride), 250 mg PEG-300, 150 mg propylene glycol, and 16 mg sodium hydroxide in dehydrated alcohol. Sodium hydroxide and/or hydrochloric acid may have been added for pH adjustment.
Gemcitabine kills cells undergoing DNA synthesis and blocks the progression of cells through the G1/S-phase boundary. Gemcitabine is metabolized by nucleoside kinases to diphosphate (dFdCDP) and triphosphate (dFdCTP) nucleosides. Gemcitabine diphosphate inhibits ribonucleotide reductase, an enzyme responsible for catalyzing the reactions that generate deoxynucleoside triphosphates for DNA synthesis, resulting in reductions in deoxynucleotide concentrations, including dCTP. Gemcitabine triphosphate competes with dCTP for incorporation into DNA. The reduction in the intracellular concentration of dCTP by the action of the diphosphate enhances the incorporation of gemcitabine triphosphate into DNA (self-potentiation). After the gemcitabine nucleotide is incorporated into DNA, only one additional nucleotide is added to the growing DNA strands, which eventually results in the initiation of apoptotic cell death.
The pharmacokinetics of gemcitabine were examined in 353 patients, with various solid tumors. Pharmacokinetic parameters were derived using data from patients treated for varying durations of therapy given weekly with periodic rest weeks and using both short infusions (<70 minutes) and long infusions (70 to 285 minutes). The total gemcitabine dose varied from 500 to 3600 mg/m 2.
Distribution
The volume of distribution was increased with infusion length. Volume of distribution of gemcitabine was 50 L/m 2following infusions lasting <70 minutes. For long infusions, the volume of distribution rose to 370 L/m 2.
Gemcitabine pharmacokinetics are linear and are described by a 2-compartment model. Population pharmacokinetic analyses of combined single and multiple dose studies showed that the volume of distribution of gemcitabine was significantly influenced by duration of infusion and sex. Gemcitabine plasma protein binding is negligible.
Elimination
Metabolism
The active metabolite, gemcitabine triphosphate, can be extracted from peripheral blood mononuclear cells. The half-life of the terminal phase for gemcitabine triphosphate from mononuclear cells ranges from 1.7 to 19.4 hours.
Excretion
Gemcitabine disposition was studied in 5 patients who received a single 1000 mg/m2 of radiolabeled drug as a 30 minute infusion. Within one week, 92% to 98% of the dose was recovered, almost entirely in the urine. Gemcitabine (<10%) and the inactive uracil metabolite, 2’-deoxy-2’,2’-difluorouridine (dFdU), accounted for 99% of the excreted dose. The metabolite dFdU is also found in plasma.
Specific Populations
Geriatric Patients
Clearance of gemcitabine was affected by age. The lower clearance in the elderly results in higher concentrations of gemcitabine for any given dose. Differences in either clearance or volume of distribution based on patient characteristics or the duration of infusion result in changes in half-life and plasma concentrations. Table 15shows plasma clearance and half-life of gemcitabine following short infusions for typical patients by age and sex.
aHalf-life for patients receiving <70 minute infusion. | ||||
Age |
Clearance Men
|
Clearance Women
|
Half-Life
aMen
|
Half-Life
aWomen
|
29 |
92.2 |
69.4 |
42 |
49 |
45 |
75.7 |
57.0 |
48 |
57 |
65 |
55.1 |
41.5 |
61 |
73 |
79 |
40.7 |
30.7 |
79 |
94 |
Gemcitabine half-life for short infusions ranged from 42 to 94 minutes, and for long infusions varied from 245 to 638 minutes, depending on age and sex, reflecting a greatly increased volume of distribution with longer infusions.
Male and Female Patients
Female patients have lower clearance and longer half-lives than male patientsas described in Table 15.
Patients with Renal Impairment
No clinical studies have been conducted with gemcitabine in patients with decreased renal function.
Patients with Hepatic Impairment
No clinical studies have been conducted with gemcitabine in patients with decreased hepatic function.
Drug Interaction Studies
When gemcitabine (1250 mg/m 2on Days 1 and 8) and cisplatin (75 mg/m 2on Day 1) were administered in patients with NSCLC, the clearance of gemcitabine on Day 1 was 128 L/hr/m 2and on Day 8 was 107 L/hr/m 2. Data from patients with NSCLC demonstrate that gemcitabine and carboplatin given in combination does not alter the pharmacokinetics of gemcitabine or carboplatin compared to administration of either single agent; however, due to wide confidence intervals and small sample size, interpatient variability may be observed. Data from metastatic breast cancer patients shows that gemcitabine has little or no effect on the pharmacokinetics (clearance and half-life) of paclitaxel and paclitaxel has little or no effect on the pharmacokinetics of gemcitabine.
Long-term animal studies to evaluate the carcinogenic potential of gemcitabine have not been conducted. Gemcitabine was mutagenic in an in vitromouse lymphoma (L5178Y) assay and was clastogenic in an in vivomouse micronucleus assay. Gemcitabine intraperitoneal doses of 0.5 mg/kg/day [about 1/700 the 1000 mg/m 2clinical dose based on body surface area (BSA)] in male mice resulted in moderate to severe hypospermatogenesis, decreased fertility, and decreased implantations. In female mice, fertility was not affected but maternal toxicities were observed at 1.5 mg/kg/day administered intravenously (about 1/200 the 1000 mg/m 2clinical dose based on BSA) and fetotoxicity or embryolethality was observed at 0.25 mg/kg/day administered intravenously (about 1/1300 the 1000 mg/m 2clinical dose based on BSA).
The efficacy of gemcitabine was evaluated in a randomized trial (Study 1) conducted in women with advanced ovarian cancer that had relapsed at least 6 months after first-line platinum-based therapy. Patients were randomized to receive either gemcitabine 1000 mg/m 2on Days 1 and 8 of each 21-day cycle with carboplatin AUC 4 on Day 1 after gemcitabine administration (n=178) or carboplatin AUC 5 on Day 1 of each 21-day cycle (n=178). The major efficacy outcome measure was progression free survival (PFS).
A total of 356 patients were enrolled. Demographics and baseline characteristics are shown in Table 16. Efficacy results are presented in Table 17 and Figure 1. The addition of gemcitabine to carboplatin resulted in statistically significant improvements in PFS and overall response rate. Approximately 75% of patients in each arm received additional chemotherapy for disease progression; 13 of 120 patients in the carboplatin alone arm received gemcitabine for treatment of disease progression. There was no significant difference in overall survival between the treatment arms.
a5 patients on gemcitabine with carboplatin arm and 4 patients on carboplatin arm had no baseline Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status. | ||
b2 patients on gemcitabine with carboplatin arm and 1 patient on carboplatin arm had platinum-free interval <6 months | ||
Table 17: Efficacy Results in Study 1 | ||
Gemcitabine /Carboplatin
|
Carboplatin
|
|
Median age, years |
59 |
58 |
Range |
36 to 79 |
21 to 81 |
Baseline ECOG performance status 0-1 a |
94% |
95% |
Disease Status |
||
Evaluable |
8% |
3% |
Bidimensionally measurable |
92% |
96% |
Platinum-free interval b |
||
6 -12 months |
40% |
40% |
>12 months |
59% |
60% |
First-line therapy |
||
Platinum-taxane combination |
70% |
71% |
Platinum-non-taxane combination |
29% |
28% |
Platinum monotherapy |
1% |
1% |
aCI=confidence interval. | |||||
bLog rank, unadjusted. | |||||
cChi square. | |||||
dCR=Complete response. | |||||
ePR plus PRNM=Partial response plus partial response, non-measurable disease. | |||||
fIndependently reviewed cohort - gemcitabine/carboplatin (n=121), carboplatin (n=101); independent reviewers unable to measure disease detected by sonography or physical exam. | |||||
Gemcitabine /Carboplatin
|
Carboplatin
|
||||
Progression-free Survival | |||||
Median (95% CI a) months |
8.6 (8.0, 9.7) |
5.8 (5.2, 7.1) |
|||
Hazard Ratio (95% CI) |
0.72 (0.57, 0.90) |
||||
p-value b |
p=0.0038 |
||||
Overall Survival | |||||
Median (95% CI) months |
18.0 (16.2, 20.3) |
17.3 (15.2, 19.3) |
|||
Hazard Ratio (95% CI) |
0.98 (0.78, 1.24) |
||||
p-value b |
p=0.8977 |
||||
Overall Response Rate by investigator |
47.2% |
30.9% |
|||
p-value c |
p=0.0016 |
||||
CR d |
14.6% |
6.2% |
|||
PR plus PRNM e |
32.6% |
24.7% |
|||
Overall Response Rate fby independent review |
46.3% |
35.6% |
|||
p-value c |
p=0.11 |
||||
CR d |
9.1% |
4.0% |
|||
PR plus PRNM e |
37.2% |
31.7% |
Figure 1: Kaplan-Meier Curve of Progression Free Survival in Study 1.
The efficacy of gemcitabine was evaluated in a multinational, randomized, open-label trial (Study 2) conducted in women receiving initial treatment for metastatic breast cancer who have received prior adjuvant/neoadjuvant anthracycline chemotherapy unless clinically contraindicated. Patients were randomized to receive either gemcitabine 1250 mg/m 2on Days 1 and 8 of a 21-day cycle and paclitaxel 175 mg/m 2administered on Day 1 before gemcitabine administration (n=267) or paclitaxel 175 mg/m 2on Day 1 of each 21-day cycle (n=262). The major efficacy outcome measure was time to documented disease progression.
A total of 529 patients were enrolled. Demographic and baseline characteristics were similar between treatment arms (Table 18).
Efficacy results are presented in Table 19 and Figure 2. The addition of gemcitabine to paclitaxel resulted in statistically significant improvement in time to documented disease progression and overall response rate compared to paclitaxel alone. There was no significant difference in overall survival.
Gemcitabine/Paclitaxel (N=267) |
Paclitaxel (N=262) |
|
Median age (years) |
53 |
52 |
Range |
26 to 83 |
26 to 75 |
Metastatic Disease |
97% |
97% |
Baseline KPS a≥90 |
70% |
74% |
Number Tumor Sites |
||
1-2 |
57% |
59% |
≥3 |
43% |
41% |
Visceral Disease |
73% |
73% |
Prior anthracycline |
97% |
96% |
aKarnofsky Performance Status
aThese represent reconciliation of investigator and Independent Review Committee assessments according to a predefined algorithm. | |||||
bBased on the ITT population. | |||||
Gemcitabine/Paclitaxel, N=267 |
Paclitaxel, N=262 |
||||
Efficacy Outcomes |
|||||
Time to Documented Disease Progression a |
|||||
Median (95% CI) in months |
5.2
|
2.9
|
|||
Hazard Ratio (95% CI) |
0.650 (0.524, 0.805) |
||||
p-value |
p<0.0001 |
||||
Overall Survival b |
|||||
Median Survival (95% CI) in months
|
18.6
|
15.8
|
|||
Hazard Ratio (95% CI) |
0.86 (0.71, 1.04) |
||||
p-value |
Not Significant |
||||
Overall Response Rate |
40.8% |
22.1% |
|||
(95% CI) |
(34.9, 46.7) |
(17.1, 27.2) |
|||
p-value |
p<0.0001 |
Figure 2: Kaplan-Meier Curve of Time to Disease Progression in Study 2
The efficacy of gemcitabine was evaluated in two randomized, multicenter trials.
Study 3: 28-Day Schedule
A multinational, randomized trial (Study 3) compared gemcitabine with cisplatin to cisplatin alone in the treatment of patients with inoperable Stage IIIA, IIIB, or IV NSCLC who had not received prior chemotherapy. Patients were randomized to receive either gemcitabine 1000 mg/m 2on Days 1, 8, and 15 of a 28-day cycle with cisplatin 100 mg/m 2on Day 1 after gemcitabine administration (n=260) or cisplatin 100 mg/m 2on Day 1 of each 28-day cycle (N=262). The major efficacy outcome measure was overall survival. A total of 522 patients were enrolled. Demographics and baseline characteristics (Table 20) were similar between arms with the exception of histologic subtype of NSCLC, with 48% of patients on the cisplatin arm and 37% of patients on the gemcitabine with cisplatin arm having adenocarcinoma.
Efficacy results are presented in Table 221 and Figure 3for overall survival.
Study 4: 21-Day Schedule
A randomized (1:1), multicenter trial (Study 4) was conducted in patients with Stage IIIB or IV NSCLC. Patients were randomized to receive either gemcitabine 1250 mg/m 2on Days 1 and 8 of each 21-day cycle with cisplatin 100 mg/m 2on Day 1 after gemcitabine administration or etoposide 100 mg/m 2intravenously on Days 1, 2, and 3 with cisplatin 100 mg/m 2on Day 1 of each 21 -day cycle. The major efficacy outcome measure was response rate. A total of 135 patients were enrolled. Demographics and baseline characteristics are summarized in Table 20. Efficacy results are presented in Table 21. There was no significant difference in survival between the two treatment arms. The median survival was 8.7 months for the gemcitabine with cisplatin arm versus 7 months for the etoposide with cisplatin arm. Median time to disease progression for the gemcitabine with cisplatin arm was 5 months compared to 4.1 months on the etoposide with cisplatin arm (Log-rank p=0.015, two-sided). The objective response rate for the gemcitabine with cisplatin arm was 33% compared to 14% on the etoposide with cisplatin arm (Fisher’s Exact p=0.01, two-sided).
Trial |
28-day Schedule (Study 3) |
21-day Schedule (Study 4) |
||
Gemcitabine/Cisplatin (N=260) |
Cisplatin (N=262) |
Gemcitabine/Cisplatin (N=69) |
Etoposide/Cisplatin (N=66) |
|
Male |
70% |
71% |
93% |
92% |
Median age, years |
62 |
63 |
58 |
60 |
Range |
36 to 88 |
35 to 79 |
33 to 76 |
35 to 75 |
Stage IIIA |
7% |
7% |
N/A a |
N/A a |
Stage IIIB |
26% |
23% |
48% |
52% |
Stage IV |
67% |
70% |
52% |
49% |
Baseline KPS b70 to 80 |
41% |
44% |
45% |
52% |
Baseline KPS b90 to 100 |
57% |
55% |
55% |
49% |
aN/A Not Applicable
bKarnofsky Performance Status.
aCI=confidence intervals. | |||||||||
bp-value two-sided Fisher's Exact test for difference in binomial proportions; log rank test for time-to-event analyses. | |||||||||
Trial |
28-day Schedule (Study 3) |
21-day Schedule (Study 4) |
|||||||
Efficacy Parameter |
Gemcitabine/ Cisplatin |
Cisplatin |
Gemcitabine/ Cisplatin |
Etoposide/ Cisplatin |
|||||
Survival |
|||||||||
Median (95% CI a) in months |
9.0 (8.2, 11.0) |
7.6 (6.6, 8.8) |
8.7 (7.8, 10.1) |
7.0 (6.0, 9.7) |
|||||
p-value b |
p=0.008 |
p=0.18 |
|||||||
Time to Disease Progression | |||||||||
Median (95% CI a) in months |
5.2 (4.2, 5.7) |
3.7 (3.0, 4.3) |
5.0 (4.2, 6.4) |
4.1 (2.4, 4.5) |
|||||
p-value b |
p=0.009 |
p=0.015 |
|||||||
Tumor Response |
26% |
10% |
33% |
14% |
|||||
p-value b |
p<0.0001 |
p=0.01 |
Figure 3: Kaplan-Meier Survival Curves in Study 3
The efficacy of gemcitabine was evaluated in two trials, (Studies 5 and 6), a randomized, single-blind, two-arm, active-controlled trial (Study 5) conducted in patients with locally advanced or metastatic pancreatic cancer who had received no prior chemotherapy and in a single-arm, open-label, multicenter trial (Study 6) conducted in patients with locally advanced or metastatic pancreatic cancer previously treated with fluorouracil or a fluorouracil-containing regimen. In Study 5, patients were randomized to receive either gemcitabine 1000 mg/m 2intravenously over 30 minutes once weekly for 7 weeks followed by a one-week rest, then once weekly for 3 consecutive weeks every 28-days in subsequent cycles (n=63) or fluorouracil 600 mg/m 2intravenously over 30 minutes once weekly (n=63). In the Study 6, all patients received gemcitabine 1000 mg/m 2intravenously over 30 minutes once weekly for 7 weeks followed by a one-week rest, then once weekly for 3 consecutive weeks every 28-days in subsequent cycles.
The major efficacy outcome measure in both trials was "clinical benefit response". A patient was considered to have had a clinical benefit response if either of the following occurred:
OR
Study 5 enrolled 126. Demographics and baseline characteristics were similar between the arms (Table 22). The efficacy results are shown in Table 23and Figure 4. Patients treated with gemcitabine had statistically significant increases in clinical benefit response, survival and time to disease progression compared to those randomized to receive fluorouracil. No confirmed objective tumor responses were observed in either treatment arm.
Gemcitabine (N=63) |
Fluorouracil (N=63) |
|
Male |
54% |
54% |
Median age, years |
62 |
61 |
Range |
37 to 79 |
36 to 77 |
Stage IV disease |
71% |
76% |
Baseline KPS a≤70 |
70% |
68% |
aKarnofsky Performance Status.
ap-value for clinical benefit response calculated using the two-sided test for difference in binomial proportions. All other p-values are calculated using log rank test. | |||||
Efficacy Parameter |
Gemcitabine
|
Fluorouracil
|
|||
Clinical benefit response p-value a |
22.2% |
4.8% |
|||
p=0.004 |
|||||
Survival |
|||||
Median (95% CI) in months |
5.7 (4.7, 6.9) |
4.2 (3.1, 5.1) |
|||
p-value a |
p=0.0009 |
||||
Time to Disease Progression |
|||||
Median (95% CI) in months |
2.1 (1.9, 3.4) |
0.9 (0.9, 1.1) |
|||
p-value a |
p=0.0013 |
Figure 4: Kaplan-Meier Survival Curve.
Gemcitabine Injection is a clear colorless to pale yellow solution available in sterile multiple-dose vials containing:
Vial | NDC number |
---|---|
|
|
Store at 20°C to 25°C (68°F to 77°F); excursions permitted between 15° C and 30°C (59°F and 86°F).
After initial puncture, Gemcitabine Injection multiple-dose vials are stable for 28 days when stored at room temperature.
Gemcitabine is a cytotoxic drug. Follow applicable special handling and disposal procedures. 1
Myelosuppression
Advise patients of the risk of myelosuppression. Instruct patients to immediately contact their healthcare provider should any signs or symptoms of infection, including fever, or if bleeding or signs of anemia, occur [see Warnings and Precautions ( 5.2)].
Pulmonary toxicity
Advise patients of the risks of pulmonary toxicity including respiratory failure and death. Instruct patients to immediately contact their healthcare provider for development of shortness of breath, wheezing, or cough [see Warnings and Precautions ( 5.3)].
Hemolytic-uremic syndrome and renal failure
Advise patients of the risks of hemolytic-uremic syndrome and associated renal failure. Instruct patients to immediately contact their healthcare provider for changes in the color or volume of urine output or for increased bruising or bleeding [see Warnings and Precautions ( 5.4)].
Hepatotoxicity
Advise patients of the risks of hepatic toxicity including liver failure and death. Instruct patients to immediately contact their healthcare provider for signs of jaundice or for pain/tenderness in the right upper abdominal quadrant [see Warnings and Precautions ( 5.5)].
Embryo-Fetal Toxicity
Advise females and males of reproductive potential that Gemcitabine Injection can cause fetal harm. Advise females of reproductive potential to use effective contraception during treatment with Gemcitabine Injection and for 6 months after the final dose. Advise male patients with female partners of reproductive potential to use effective contraception during treatment with Gemcitabine Injection and for 3 months after the final dose of Gemcitabine Injection [see Warnings and Precautions ( 5.6)and Use in Specific Populations ( 8.1, 8.3) ].
Lactation
Advise women not to breastfeed during treatment with Gemcitabine Injection and for at least one week after the last dose [see Use in Specific Populations ( 8.2)].
Infertility
Advise males of reproductive potential of the potential for reduced fertility with Gemcitabine Injection [see Use in Specific Populations ( 8.3), Nonclinical Toxicology ( 13.1)].
Manufactured By:
Intas Pharmaceuticals Limited,
Plot No.:457, 458, Village – Matoda, Bavla Road,
Ta.- Sanand, Dist. – Ahmedabad – 382 210. INDIA
For BluePoint Laboratories
PACKAGE CARTON – 200 mg/2 mL
NDC 68001- 342-34
Gemcitabine Injection
200 mg/2 mL (100 mg/mL)
For Intravenous Infusion Only
Must be Diluted Before Use
Discard 28 days after initial puncture
CAUTION: Cytotoxic Agent
Rx only
Sterile Multiple-Dose Vial
PACKAGE CONTAINER – 200 mg/2 mL
NDC 68001-342-34 Rx only
Gemcitabine Injection
200 mg/2 mL (100 mg/mL)
For Intravenous Infusion Only
Must be Diluted Before Use
Multiple-Dose Vial Sterile
PACKAGE CARTON – 1 g/10 mL
NDC 68001- 348-36
Gemcitabine Injection
1 g/10 mL (100 mg/mL)
For Intravenous Infusion Only
Must be Diluted Before Use
Discard 28 days after initial puncture
CAUTION: Cytotoxic Agent
Rx only
Sterile Multiple-Dose Vial
PACKAGE CONTAINER – 1 g/10 mL
NDC 68001- 348-36 Rx only
Gemcitabine Injection
1 g/10 mL (100 mg/mL)
For Intravenous Infusion Only
Must be Diluted Before Use
Multiple-Dose Vial Sterile
PACKAGE CARTON – 1.5 g/15 mL
NDC 68001- 350-68
Gemcitabine Injection
1.5 g/15 mL (100 mg/mL)
For Intravenous Infusion Only
Must be Diluted Before Use
Discard 28 days after initial puncture
CAUTION: Cytotoxic Agent
Rx only
Sterile Multiple-Dose Vial
PACKAGE CONTAINER – 1.5 g/15 mL
NDC 68001-350-68 Rx only
Gemcitabine Injection
1.5 g/15 mL (100 mg/mL)
For Intravenous Infusion Only
Must be Diluted Before Use
Multiple-Dose Vial Sterile
GEMCITABINE
gemcitabine injection, solution |
||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
GEMCITABINE
gemcitabine injection, solution |
||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
GEMCITABINE
gemcitabine injection, solution |
||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
GEMCITABINE
gemcitabine injection, solution |
||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
Labeler - BluePoint Laboratories (985523874) |
Registrant - Accord Healthcare Inc. (604222237) |
Establishment | |||
Name | Address | ID/FEI | Business Operations |
---|---|---|---|
Intas Pharmaceuticals Limited | 725927649 | manufacture(68001-342, 68001-348, 68001-350, 68001-359) , analysis(68001-342, 68001-348, 68001-350, 68001-359) |