ABACAVIR SULFATE - abacavir sulfate tablet, film coated 
REMEDYREPACK INC.

----------

These highlights do not include all the information needed to use abacavir tablets safely and effectively. See full prescribing information for abacavir tablets.  Abacavir Tablets, USP for Oral UseInitial U.S. Approval: 1998

Boxed Warning section

Hypersensitivity Reactions: Serious and sometimes fatal hypersensitivity reactions have been associated with abacavir (abacavir sulfate).

Hypersensitivity to abacavir is a multi-organ clinical syndrome usually characterized by a sign or symptom in two or more of the following groups: (1) fever, (2) rash, (3) gastrointestinal (including nausea, vomiting, diarrhea, or abdominal pain), (4) constitutional (including generalized malaise, fatigue, or achiness), and (5) respiratory (including dyspnea, cough, or pharyngitis). Discontinue abacavir as soon as a hypersensitivity reaction is suspected.

Patients who carry the HLA-B*5701 allele are at high risk for experiencing a hypersensitivity reaction to abacavir. Prior to initiating therapy with abacavir, screening for the HLA-B*5701 allele is recommended; this approach has been found to decrease the risk of hypersensitivity reaction. Screening is also recommended prior to reinitiation of abacavir in patients of unknown HLA-B*5701 status who have previously tolerated abacavir. HLA-B*5701-negative patients may develop a suspected hypersensitivity reaction to abacavir; however, this occurs significantly less frequently than in HLA-B*5701-positive patients.

Regardless of HLA-B*5701 status, permanently discontinue abacavir if hypersensitivity cannot be ruled out, even when other diagnoses are possible. Following a hypersensitivity reaction to abacavir, NEVER restart abacavir tablets or any other abacavir-containing product because more severe symptoms can occur within hours and may include life threatening hypotension and death.

Reintroduction of abacavir tablets or any other abacavir-containing product, even in patients who have no identified history or unrecognized symptoms of hypersensitivity to abacavir therapy, can result in serious or fatal hypersensitivity reactions. Such reactions can occur within hours [see Warnings and Precautions (5.1)].

Lactic Acidosis and Severe Hepatomegaly: Lactic acidosis and severe hepatomegaly with steatosis, including fatal cases, have been reported with the use of nucleoside analogues alone or in combination, including abacavir and other antiretrovirals [see Warnings and Precautions (5.2)].

 

INDICATIONS & USAGE

Abacavir tablets, in combination with other antiretroviral agents, are indicated for the treatment of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV-1) infection.

Additional important information on the use of abacavir tablets for treatment of HIV-1 infection:

 

DOSAGE & ADMINISTRATION

 

The recommended oral dose of abacavir tablets for adults is 600 mg daily, administered as either 300 mg twice daily or 600 mg once daily, in combination with other antiretroviral agents.

 

The recommended oral dose of abacavir oral solution in HIV-1-infected pediatric patients aged 3 months and older is 8 mg/kg twice daily (up to a maximum of 300 mg twice daily) in combination with other antiretroviral agents.

Abacavir is also available as a scored tablet for HIV-1-infected pediatric patients weighing greater than or equal to 14 kg for whom a solid dosage form is appropriate. Before prescribing abacavir tablets, children should be assessed for the ability to swallow tablets. If a child is unable to reliably swallow abacavir tablets, the oral solution formulation should be prescribed. The recommended oral dosage of abacavir tablets for HIV-1-infected pediatric patients is presented in Table 1.

Table 1. Dosing Recommendations for Abacavir Tablets in Pediatric Patients
Weight
(kg)
Dosage Regimen Using Scored TabletTotal
Daily Dose
AM DosePM Dose
14 to 21½ tablet (150 mg)½ tablet (150 mg)300 mg
> 21 to < 30½ tablet (150 mg)1 tablet (300 mg)450 mg
≥ 301 tablet (300 mg)1 tablet (300 mg)600 mg

 

The recommended dose of abacavir tablets in patients with mild hepatic impairment (Child-Pugh score 5 to 6) is 200 mg twice daily. To enable dose reduction, abacavir oral solution (10 mL twice daily) should be used for the treatment of these patients. The safety, efficacy, and pharmacokinetic properties of abacavir have not been established in patients with moderate to severe hepatic impairment; therefore, abacavir tablets are contraindicated in these patients.

 

DOSAGE FORMS & STRENGTHS

Abacavir Tablets, USP are available containing abacavir sulfate, USP equivalent to 300 mg of abacavir.

The 300 mg tablets are peach film-coated, capsule shaped, scored tablets debossed with M on one side of the score and 120 on the other side of the score on one side of the tablet and blank on the other side.

 

CONTRAINDICATIONS

Abacavir tablets are contraindicated in patients with:

 

WARNINGS AND PRECAUTIONS

Serious and sometimes fatal hypersensitivity reactions have been associated with abacavir tablets and other abacavir-containing products. Patients who carry the HLA-B*5701 allele are at high risk for experiencing a hypersensitivity reaction to abacavir. Prior to initiating therapy with abacavir, screening for the HLA-B*5701 allele is recommended; this approach has been found to decrease the risk of a hypersensitivity reaction. Screening is also recommended prior to reinitiation of abacavir in patients of unknown HLA-B*5701 status who have previously tolerated abacavir. For HLA-B*5701-positive patients, treatment with an abacavir-containing regimen is not recommended and should be considered only with close medical supervision and under exceptional circumstances when the potential benefit outweighs the risk.

HLA-B*5701-negative patients may develop a hypersensitivity reaction to abacavir; however, this occurs significantly less frequently than in HLA-B*5701-positive patients. Regardless of HLA-B*5701 status, permanently discontinue abacavir if hypersensitivity cannot be ruled out, even when other diagnoses are possible.

Important information on signs and symptoms of hypersensitivity, as well as clinical management, is presented below.

 

Hypersensitivity to abacavir is a multi-organ clinical syndrome usually characterized by a sign or symptom in two or more of the following groups.

Group 1: Fever

Group 2: Rash

Group 3: Gastrointestinal (including nausea, vomiting, diarrhea, or abdominal pain)

Group 4: Constitutional (including generalized malaise, fatigue, or achiness)

Group 5: Respiratory (including dyspnea, cough, or pharyngitis).

Hypersensitivity to abacavir following the presentation of a single sign or symptom has been reported infrequently.

Hypersensitivity to abacavir was reported in approximately 8% of 2,670 subjects (n = 206) in nine clinical trials (range: 2% to 9%) with enrollment from November 1999 to February 2002. Data on time to onset and symptoms of suspected hypersensitivity were collected on a detailed data collection module. The frequencies of symptoms are shown in Figure 1. Symptoms usually appeared within the first 6 weeks of treatment with abacavir, although the reaction may occur at any time during therapy. Median time to onset was 9 days; 89% appeared within the first 6 weeks; 95% of subjects reported symptoms from two or more of the five groups listed above.

MM1

Figure 1. Hypersensitivity-related Symptoms Reported with ≥ 10% Frequency in Clinical Trials (n = 206 Subjects)

Other less common signs and symptoms of hypersensitivity include lethargy, myolysis, edema, abnormal chest x-ray findings (predominantly infiltrates, which can be localized), and paresthesia. Anaphylaxis, liver failure, renal failure, hypotension, adult respiratory distress syndrome, respiratory failure, and death have occurred in association with hypersensitivity reactions. In one trial, four subjects (11%) receiving abacavir 600 mg once daily experienced hypotension with a hypersensitivity reaction compared with zero subjects receiving abacavir 300 mg twice daily.

Physical findings associated with hypersensitivity to abacavir in some patients include lymphadenopathy, mucous membrane lesions (conjunctivitis and mouth ulcerations), and rash. The rash usually appears maculopapular or urticarial, but may be variable in appearance. There have been reports of erythema multiforme. Hypersensitivity reactions have occurred without rash.

Laboratory abnormalities associated with hypersensitivity to abacavir in some patients include elevated liver function tests, elevated creatine phosphokinase, elevated creatinine, and lymphopenia.

 

Discontinue abacavir as soon as a hypersensitivity reaction is suspected. To minimize the risk of a life threatening hypersensitivity reaction, permanently discontinue abacavir if hypersensitivity cannot be ruled out, even when other diagnoses are possible (e.g., acute onset respiratory diseases such as pneumonia, bronchitis, pharyngitis, or influenza; gastroenteritis; or reactions to other medications).

Following a hypersensitivity reaction to abacavir, NEVER restart abacavir tablets or any other abacavir-containing product because more severe symptoms can occur within hours and may include life threatening hypotension and death.

When therapy with abacavir has been discontinued for reasons other than symptoms of a hypersensitivity reaction, and if reinitiation of abacavir tablets or any other abacavir-containing product is under consideration, carefully evaluate the reason for discontinuation of abacavir to ensure that the patient did not have symptoms of a hypersensitivity reaction. If the patient is of unknown HLA-B*5701 status, screening for the allele is recommended prior to reinitiation of abacavir.

If hypersensitivity cannot be ruled out, DO NOT reintroduce abacavir tablets or any other abacavir-containing product. Even in the absence of the HLA-B*5701 allele, it is important to permanently discontinue abacavir and not rechallenge with abacavir if a hypersensitivity reaction cannot be ruled out on clinical grounds, due to the potential for a severe or even fatal reaction.

If symptoms consistent with hypersensitivity are not identified, reintroduction can be undertaken with continued monitoring for symptoms of a hypersensitivity reaction. Make patients aware that a hypersensitivity reaction can occur with reintroduction of abacavir tablets or any other abacavir-containing product and that reintroduction of abacavir tablets or any other abacavir-containing product needs to be undertaken only if medical care can be readily accessed by the patient or others.

Risk Factor:HLA-B*5701 Allele: Trials have shown that carriage of the HLA-B*5701 allele is associated with a significantly increased risk of a hypersensitivity reaction to abacavir.

CNA106030 (PREDICT-1), a randomized, double-blind trial, evaluated the clinical utility of prospective HLA-B*5701 screening on the incidence of abacavir hypersensitivity reaction in abacavir-naive HIV-1-infected adults (n = 1,650). In this trial, use of pre-therapy screening for the HLA-B*5701 allele and exclusion of subjects with this allele reduced the incidence of clinically suspected abacavir hypersensitivity reactions from 7.8% (66/847) to 3.4% (27/803). Based on this trial, it is estimated that 61% of patients with the HLA-B*5701 allele will develop a clinically suspected hypersensitivity reaction during the course of abacavir treatment compared with 4% of patients who do not have the HLA-B*5701 allele.

Screening for carriage of the HLA-B*5701 allele is recommended prior to initiating treatment with abacavir. Screening is also recommended prior to reinitiation of abacavir in patients of unknown HLA-B*5701 status who have previously tolerated abacavir. For HLA-B*5701-positive patients, initiating or reinitiating treatment with an abacavir-containing regimen is not recommended and should be considered only with close medical supervision and under exceptional circumstances where potential benefit outweighs the risk.

Skin patch testing is used as a research tool and should not be used to aid in the clinical diagnosis of abacavir hypersensitivity.

In any patient treated with abacavir, the clinical diagnosis of hypersensitivity reaction must remain the basis of clinical decision-making. Even in the absence of the HLA-B*5701 allele, it is important to permanently discontinue abacavir and not rechallenge with abacavir if a hypersensitivity reaction cannot be ruled out on clinical grounds, due to the potential for a severe or even fatal reaction.

 

Lactic acidosis and severe hepatomegaly with steatosis, including fatal cases, have been reported with the use of nucleoside analogues alone or in combination, including abacavir and other antiretrovirals. A majority of these cases have been in women. Obesity and prolonged nucleoside exposure may be risk factors. Particular caution should be exercised when administering abacavir to any patient with known risk factors for liver disease; however, cases have also been reported in patients with no known risk factors. Treatment with abacavir should be suspended in any patient who develops clinical or laboratory findings suggestive of lactic acidosis or pronounced hepatotoxicity (which may include hepatomegaly and steatosis even in the absence of marked transaminase elevations).

 

Immune reconstitution syndrome has been reported in patients treated with combination antiretroviral therapy, including abacavir. During the initial phase of combination antiretroviral treatment, patients whose immune systems respond may develop an inflammatory response to indolent or residual opportunistic infections (such as Mycobacterium avium infection, cytomegalovirus, Pneumocystis jirovecii pneumonia [PCP], or tuberculosis), which may necessitate further evaluation and treatment.

Autoimmune disorders (such as Graves’ disease, polymyositis, and Guillain-Barré syndrome) have also been reported to occur in the setting of immune reconstitution, however, the time to onset is more variable, and can occur many months after initiation of treatment.

 

Redistribution/accumulation of body fat including central obesity, dorsocervical fat enlargement (buffalo hump), peripheral wasting, facial wasting, breast enlargement, and “cushingoid appearance” have been observed in patients receiving antiretroviral therapy. The mechanism and long-term consequences of these events are currently unknown. A causal relationship has not been established.

 

In a published prospective, observational, epidemiological study designed to investigate the rate of myocardial infarction in patients on combination antiretroviral therapy, the use of abacavir within the previous 6 months was correlated with an increased risk of myocardial infarction (MI).1 In a sponsor-conducted pooled analysis of clinical trials, no excess risk of myocardial infarction was observed in abacavir-treated subjects as compared with control subjects. In totality, the available data from the observational cohort and from clinical trials are inconclusive.

As a precaution, the underlying risk of coronary heart disease should be considered when prescribing antiretroviral therapies, including abacavir, and action taken to minimize all modifiable risk factors (e.g., hypertension, hyperlipidemia, diabetes mellitus, smoking).

 

ADVERSE REACTIONS

The following adverse reactions are discussed in greater detail in other sections of the labeling:

 

Because clinical trials are conducted under widely varying conditions, adverse reaction rates observed in the clinical trials of a drug cannot be directly compared with rates in the clinical trials of another drug and may not reflect the rates observed in practice.

 

Treatment-emergent clinical adverse reactions (rated by the investigator as moderate or severe) with a greater than or equal to 5% frequency during therapy with abacavir 300 mg twice daily, lamivudine 150 mg twice daily, and efavirenz 600 mg daily compared with zidovudine 300 mg twice daily, lamivudine 150 mg twice daily, and efavirenz 600 mg daily from CNA30024 are listed in Table 2.

Table 2. Treatment-emergent (All Causality) Adverse Reactions of at Least Moderate Intensity (Grades 2 to 4, ≥ 5% Frequency) in Therapy-naive Adults (CNA30024*) Through 48 Weeks of Treatment
Adverse ReactionAbacavir plus
Lamivudine plus Efavirenz
(n = 324)
Zidovudine plus Lamivudine
plus Efavirenz
(n = 325)
Dreams/sleep disorders10%10%
Drug hypersensitivity9%< 1%
Headaches/migraine7%11%
Nausea7%11%
Fatigue/malaise7%10%
Diarrhea7%6%
Rashes6%12%
Abdominal pain/gastritis/gastrointestinal signs and symptoms6%8%
Depressive disorders6%6%
Dizziness6%6%
Musculoskeletal pain6%5%
Bronchitis4%5%
Vomiting2%9%

Treatment-emergent clinical adverse reactions (rated by the investigator as moderate or severe) with a greater than or equal to 5% frequency during therapy with abacavir 300 mg twice daily, lamivudine 150 mg twice daily, and zidovudine 300 mg twice daily compared with indinavir 800 mg 3 times daily, lamivudine 150 mg twice daily, and zidovudine 300 mg twice daily from CNA3005 are listed in Table 3.

Table 3. Treatment-emergent (All Causality) Adverse Reactions of at Least Moderate Intensity (Grades 2 to 4, ≥ 5% Frequency) in Therapy-naive Adults (CNA3005) Through 48 Weeks of Treatment
Adverse ReactionAbacavir plus
Lamivudine/Zidovudine
(n = 262)
Indinavir plus
Lamivudine/Zidovudine
(n = 264)
Nausea19%17%
Headache13%9%
Malaise and fatigue12%12%
Nausea and vomiting10%10%
Hypersensitivity reaction8%2%
Diarrhea7%5%
Fever and/or chills6%3%
Depressive disorders6%4%
Musculoskeletal pain5%7%
Skin rashes5%4%
Ear/nose/throat infections5%4%
Viral respiratory infections5%5%
Anxiety5%3%
Renal signs/symptoms< 1%5%
Pain (non-site-specific)< 1%5%

Five subjects receiving abacavir in CNA3005 experienced worsening of preexisting depression compared with none in the indinavir arm. The background rates of preexisting depression were similar in the two treatment arms.

 

Treatment-emergent clinical adverse reactions (rated by the investigator as at least moderate) with a greater than or equal to 5% frequency during therapy with abacavir 600 mg once daily or abacavir 300 mg twice daily both in combination with lamivudine 300 mg once daily and efavirenz 600 mg once daily from CNA30021 were similar. For hypersensitivity reactions, subjects receiving abacavir once daily showed a rate of 9% in comparison with a rate of 7% for subjects receiving abacavir twice daily. However, subjects receiving abacavir 600 mg once daily, experienced a significantly higher incidence of severe drug hypersensitivity reactions and severe diarrhea compared with subjects who received abacavir 300 mg twice daily. Five percent (5%) of subjects receiving abacavir 600 mg once daily had severe drug hypersensitivity reactions compared with 2% of subjects receiving abacavir 300 mg twice daily. Two percent (2%) of subjects receiving abacavir 600 mg once daily had severe diarrhea while none of the subjects receiving abacavir 300 mg twice daily had this event.

 

Laboratory abnormalities (Grades 3 to 4) in therapy-naive adults during therapy with abacavir 300 mg twice daily, lamivudine 150 mg twice daily, and efavirenz 600 mg daily compared with zidovudine 300 mg twice daily, lamivudine 150 mg twice daily, and efavirenz 600 mg daily from CNA30024 are listed in Table 4.

Table 4. Laboratory Abnormalities (Grades 3 to 4) in Therapy-naive Adults (CNA30024) Through 48 Weeks of Treatment
Grade 3/4 Laboratory AbnormalitiesAbacavir plus
Lamivudine plus Efavirenz
(n = 324)
Zidovudine plus Lamivudine
plus Efavirenz
(n = 325)
Elevated CPK (> 4 x ULN)8%8%
Elevated ALT (> 5 x ULN)6%6%
Elevated AST (> 5 x ULN)6%5%
Hypertriglyceridemia (> 750 mg/dL)6%5%
Hyperamylasemia (> 2 x ULN)4%5%
Neutropenia (ANC < 750/mm3)2%4%
Anemia (Hgb ≤ 6.9 gm/dL)< 1%2%
Thrombocytopenia (Platelets < 50,000/mm3)1%< 1%
Leukopenia (WBC ≤ 1,500/mm3)< 1%2%
ULN = Upper limit of normal.
n = Number of subjects assessed.

Laboratory abnormalities in CNA3005 are listed in Table 5.

Table 5. Treatment-emergent Laboratory Abnormalities (Grades 3 to 4) in CNA3005
Grade 3/4 Laboratory AbnormalitiesNumber of Subjects by Treatment Group
Abacavir plus
Lamivudine/Zidovudine
(n = 262)
Indinavir plus
Lamivudine/Zidovudine
(n = 264)
Elevated CPK (> 4 x ULN)18 (7%)18 (7%)
ALT (> 5 x ULN)16 (6%)16 (6%)
Neutropenia (< 750/mm3)13 (5%)13 (5%)
Hypertriglyceridemia (> 750 mg/dL)5 (2%)3 (1%)
Hyperamylasemia (> 2 x ULN)5 (2%)1 (< 1%)
Hyperglycemia (> 13.9 mmol/L)2 (< 1%)2 (< 1%)
Anemia (Hgb ≤ 6.9 g/dL)0 (0%)3 (1%)
ULN = Upper limit of normal.
n = Number of subjects assessed.

The frequencies of treatment-emergent laboratory abnormalities were comparable between treatment groups in CNA30021.

 

Treatment-emergent clinical adverse reactions (rated by the investigator as moderate or severe) with a greater than or equal to 5% frequency during therapy with abacavir 8 mg/kg twice daily, lamivudine 4 mg/kg twice daily and zidovudine 180 mg/m2 twice daily compared with lamivudine 4 mg/kg twice daily and zidovudine 180 mg/m2 twice daily from CNA3006 are listed in Table 6.

Table 6. Treatment-emergent (All Causality) Adverse Reactions of at Least Moderate Intensity (Grades 2 to 4, ≥ 5% Frequency) in Therapy-experienced Pediatric Subjects (CNA3006) Through 16 Weeks of Treatment
Adverse ReactionAbacavir plus Lamivudine plus Zidovudine
(n = 102)
Lamivudine plus Zidovudine
(n = 103)
Fever and/or chills9%7%
Nausea and vomiting9%2%
Skin rashes7%1%
Ear/nose/throat infections5%1%
Pneumonia4%5%
Headache1%5%

 

In CNA3006, laboratory abnormalities (anemia, neutropenia, liver function test abnormalities, and CPK elevations) were observed with similar frequencies as in a trial of therapy-naive adults (CNA30024). Mild elevations of blood glucose were more frequent in pediatric patients receiving abacavir (CNA3006) as compared with adult subjects (CNA30024).

 

In addition to adverse reactions and laboratory abnormalities reported in Tables 2, 3, 4, 5, and 6, other adverse reactions observed in the expanded access program were pancreatitis and increased GGT.

 

In addition to adverse reactions reported from clinical trials, the following reactions have been identified during post-marketing use of abacavir. Because they are reported voluntarily from a population of unknown size, estimates of frequency cannot be made. These reactions have been chosen for inclusion due to a combination of their seriousness, frequency of reporting, or potential causal connection to abacavir.

Body as a Whole: Redistribution/accumulation of body fat.

Cardiovascular: Myocardial infarction.

Hepatic: Lactic acidosis and hepatic steatosis.

Skin: Suspected Stevens-Johnson syndrome (SJS) and toxic epidermal necrolysis (TEN) have been reported in patients receiving abacavir primarily in combination with medications known to be associated with SJS and TEN, respectively. Because of the overlap of clinical signs and symptoms between hypersensitivity to abacavir and SJS and TEN, and the possibility of multiple drug sensitivities in some patients, abacavir should be discontinued and not restarted in such cases.

There have also been reports of erythema multiforme with abacavir use.

 


1
This trial used double-blind ascertainment of suspected hypersensitivity reactions. During the blinded portion of the trial, suspected hypersensitivity to abacavir was reported by investigators in 9% of 324 subjects in the abacavir group and 3% of 325 subjects in the zidovudine group.
2
Ten (3%) cases of suspected drug hypersensitivity were reclassified as not being due to abacavir following unblinding.

DRUG INTERACTIONS

 Abacavir has no effect on the pharmacokinetic properties of ethanol. Ethanol decreases the elimination of abacavir causing an increase in overall exposure [see Clinical Pharmacology (12.3)].

 

The addition of methadone has no clinically significant effect on the pharmacokinetic properties of abacavir. In a trial of 11 HIV-1-infected subjects receiving methadone-maintenance therapy with 600 mg of abacavir twice daily (twice the currently recommended dose), oral methadone clearance increased [see Clinical Pharmacology (12.3)]. This alteration will not result in a methadone dose modification in the majority of patients; however, an increased methadone dose may be required in a small number of patients.

 

USE IN SPECIFIC POPULATIONS

Studies in pregnant rats showed that abacavir is transferred to the fetus through the placenta. Fetal malformations (increased incidences of fetal anasarca and skeletal malformations) and developmental toxicity (depressed fetal body weight and reduced crown-rump length) were observed in rats at a dose which produced 35 times the human exposure based on AUC. Embryonic and fetal toxicities (increased resorptions, decreased fetal body weights) and toxicities to the offspring (increased incidence of stillbirth and lower body weights) occurred at half of the above-mentioned dose in separate fertility studies conducted in rats. In the rabbit, no developmental toxicity and no increases in fetal malformations occurred at doses that produced 8.5 times the human exposure at the recommended dose based on AUC.

There are no adequate and well controlled studies in pregnant women. Abacavir should be used during pregnancy only if the potential benefits outweigh the risk.

 

To monitor maternal-fetal outcomes of pregnant women exposed to abacavir, an Antiretroviral Pregnancy Registry has been established. Physicians are encouraged to register patients by calling 1-800-258-4263.

 

The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention recommend that HIV-1-infected mothers not breast-feed their infants to avoid risking postnatal transmission of HIV-1 infection.

Although it is not known if abacavir is excreted in human milk, abacavir is secreted into the milk of lactating rats. Because of both the potential for HIV-1 transmission and the potential for serious adverse reactions in nursing infants, mothers should be instructed not to breast-feed if they are receiving abacavir.

 

The safety and effectiveness of abacavir have been established in pediatric patients 3 months to 13 years of age. Use of abacavir in these age groups is supported by pharmacokinetic trials and evidence from adequate and well controlled trials of abacavir in adults and pediatric patients [see Dosage and Administration (2.2), Clinical Pharmacology (12.3), Clinical Studies (14.2)].

 

Clinical studies of abacavir did not include sufficient numbers of patients aged 65 and over to determine whether they respond differently from younger patients. In general, dose selection for an elderly patient should be cautious, reflecting the greater frequency of decreased hepatic, renal, or cardiac function, and of concomitant disease or other drug therapy.

 

OVERDOSAGE

There is no known antidote for abacavir. It is not known whether abacavir can be removed by peritoneal dialysis or hemodialysis.

 

DESCRIPTION

Abacavir sulfate is a synthetic carbocyclic nucleoside analogue with inhibitory activity against HIV-1. The chemical name of abacavir sulfate is (1S,cis)-4-[2-amino-6-(cyclopropylamino)-9H-purin-9-yl]-2-cyclopentene-1-methanol sulfate (salt) (2:1). Abacavir sulfate is the enantiomer with 1S, 4R absolute configuration on the cyclopentene ring. It has a molecular formula of (C14H18N6O)2•H2SO4 and a molecular weight of 670.76 daltons. It has the following structural formula:

MM2

Abacavir sulfate, USP is an off-white to cream colored crystalline powder with a solubility of approximately 77 mg/mL in distilled water at 25°C. It has an octanol/water (pH 7.1 to 7.3) partition coefficient (log P) of approximately 1.20 at 25°C.

Abacavir tablets, USP are for oral administration. Each tablet contains abacavir sulfate, USP equivalent to 300 mg of abacavir as active ingredient and the following inactive ingredients: colloidal silicon dioxide, hypromellose, magnesium stearate, microcrystalline cellulose, polyethylene glycol, red iron oxide, sodium starch glycolate, titanium dioxide and yellow iron oxide.

In vivo, abacavir sulfate dissociates to its free base, abacavir. All dosages for abacavir tablets are expressed in terms of abacavir.

 

CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY

Abacavir is an antiviral agent [see Clinical Pharmacology (12.4)].

 

The pharmacokinetic properties of abacavir have been studied in asymptomatic, HIV-1-infected adult patients after administration of a single intravenous (IV) dose of 150 mg and after single and multiple oral doses. The pharmacokinetic properties of abacavir were independent of dose over the range of 300 to 1,200 mg/day.

 

Abacavir was rapidly and extensively absorbed after oral administration. The geometric mean absolute bioavailability of the tablet was 83%. After oral administration of 300 mg twice daily in 20 subjects, the steady-state peak serum abacavir concentration (Cmax) was 3 ± 0.89 mcg/mL (mean ± SD) and AUC(0-12 hr) was 6.02 ± 1.73 mcg•hr/mL. After oral administration of a single dose of 600 mg of abacavir in 20 subjects, Cmax was 4.26 ± 1.19 mcg/mL (mean ± SD) and AUC was 11.95 ± 2.51 mcg•hr/mL.

 

The apparent volume of distribution after IV administration of abacavir was
0.86 ± 0.15 L/kg, suggesting that abacavir distributes into extravascular space. In three subjects, the CSF AUC(0-6 hr) to plasma abacavir AUC(0-6 hr) ratio ranged from 27% to 33%.

Binding of abacavir to human plasma proteins is approximately 50%. Binding of abacavir to plasma proteins was independent of concentration. Total blood and plasma drug-related radioactivity concentrations are identical, demonstrating that abacavir readily distributes into erythrocytes.

 

In humans, abacavir is not significantly metabolized by cytochrome P450 enzymes. The primary routes of elimination of abacavir are metabolism by alcohol dehydrogenase (to form the 5′-carboxylic acid) and glucuronyl transferase (to form the 5′-glucuronide). The metabolites do not have antiviral activity. In vitro experiments reveal that abacavir does not inhibit human CYP3A4, CYP2D6, or CYP2C9 activity at clinically relevant concentrations.

 

Elimination of abacavir was quantified in a mass balance trial following administration of a 600 mg dose of 14C-abacavir: 99% of the radioactivity was recovered, 1.2% was excreted in the urine as abacavir, 30% as the 5′-carboxylic acid metabolite, 36% as the 5′-glucuronide metabolite and 15% as unidentified minor metabolites in the urine. Fecal elimination accounted for 16% of the dose.

In single-dose trials, the observed elimination half-life (t1/2) was 1.54 ± 0.63 hours. After intravenous administration, total clearance was 0.8 ± 0.24 L/hr/kg (mean ± SD).

 

Bioavailability of abacavir tablets was assessed in the fasting and fed states. There was no significant difference in systemic exposure (AUC) in the fed and fasting states; therefore, abacavir tablets may be administered with or without food. Systemic exposure to abacavir was comparable after administration of abacavir oral solution and abacavir tablets. Therefore, these products may be used interchangeably.

 

The pharmacokinetic properties of abacavir have not been determined in patients with impaired renal function. Renal excretion of unchanged abacavir is a minor route of elimination in humans.

 

The pharmacokinetics of abacavir have been studied in subjects with mild hepatic impairment (Child-Pugh score 5 to 6). Results showed that there was a mean increase of 89% in the abacavir AUC, and an increase of 58% in the half-life of abacavir after a single dose of 600 mg of abacavir. The AUCs of the metabolites were not modified by mild liver disease; however, the rates of formation and elimination of the metabolites were decreased. A dose of 200 mg (provided by 10 mL of abacavir oral solution) administered twice daily is recommended for patients with mild liver disease. The safety, efficacy, and pharmacokinetics of abacavir have not been studied in patients with moderate or severe hepatic impairment, therefore abacavir is contraindicated in these patients.

 

The pharmacokinetics of abacavir have been studied after either single or repeat doses of abacavir in 68 pediatric subjects. Following multiple dose administration of abacavir 8 mg/kg twice daily, steady-state AUC(0-12 hr) and Cmax were 9.8 ± 4.56 mcg•hr/mL and 3.71 ± 1.36 mcg/mL (mean ± SD), respectively [see Use in Specific Populations (8.4)]. In addition, to support dosing of abacavir scored tablet (300 mg) for pediatric patients 14 kg to greater than 30 kg, analysis of actual and simulated pharmacokinetic data indicated comparable exposures are expected following administration of 300 mg scored tablet and the 8 mg/kg dosing regimen using oral solution.

 

The pharmacokinetics of abacavir have not been studied in patients over 65 years of age.

 

A population pharmacokinetic analysis in HIV-1-infected male (n = 304) and female (n = 67) subjects showed no gender differences in abacavir AUC normalized for lean body weight.

 

There are no significant differences between blacks and Caucasians in abacavir pharmacokinetics.

 

In human liver microsomes, abacavir did not inhibit cytochrome P450 isoforms (2C9, 2D6, 3A4). Based on these data, it is unlikely that clinically significant drug interactions will occur between abacavir and drugs metabolized through these pathways.

 

Due to the common metabolic pathways of abacavir and zidovudine via glucuronyl transferase, 15 HIV-1-infected subjects were enrolled in a crossover trial evaluating single doses of abacavir (600 mg), lamivudine (150 mg), and zidovudine (300 mg) alone or in combination. Analysis showed no clinically relevant changes in the pharmacokinetics of abacavir with the addition of lamivudine or zidovudine or the combination of lamivudine and zidovudine. Lamivudine exposure (AUC decreased 15%) and zidovudine exposure (AUC increased 10%) did not show clinically relevant changes with concurrent abacavir.

 

Due to the common metabolic pathways of abacavir and ethanol via alcohol dehydrogenase, the pharmacokinetic interaction between abacavir and ethanol was studied in 24 HIV-1-infected male subjects. Each subject received the following treatments on separate occasions: a single 600 mg dose of abacavir, 0.7 g/kg ethanol (equivalent to five alcoholic drinks), and abacavir 600 mg plus 0.7 g/kg ethanol. Coadministration of ethanol and abacavir resulted in a 41% increase in abacavir AUC and a 26% increase in abacavir t1/2. In males, abacavir had no effect on the pharmacokinetic properties of ethanol, so no clinically significant interaction is expected in men. This interaction has not been studied in females.

 

In a study of 11 HIV-1-infected subjects receiving methadone-maintenance therapy (40 mg and 90 mg daily), with 600 mg of abacavir twice daily (twice the currently recommended dose), oral methadone clearance increased 22% (90% CI: 6% to 42%). This alteration will not result in a methadone dose modification in the majority of patients; however, an increased methadone dose may be required in a small number of patients. The addition of methadone had no clinically significant effect on the pharmacokinetic properties of abacavir.

 

Abacavir is a carbocyclic synthetic nucleoside analogue. Abacavir is converted by cellular enzymes to the active metabolite, carbovir triphosphate (CBV-TP), an analogue of deoxyguanosine-5′-triphosphate (dGTP). CBV-TP inhibits the activity of HIV-1 reverse transcriptase (RT) both by competing with the natural substrate dGTP and by its incorporation into viral DNA. The lack of a 3′-OH group in the incorporated nucleotide analogue prevents the formation of the 5′ to 3′ phosphodiester linkage essential for DNA chain elongation, and therefore, the viral DNA growth is terminated. CBV-TP is a weak inhibitor of cellular DNA polymerases α, β, and γ.

 

The antiviral activity of abacavir against HIV-1 was evaluated against a T-cell tropic laboratory strain HIV-1IIIB in lymphoblastic cell lines, a monocyte/macrophage tropic laboratory strain HIV-1BaL in primary monocytes/macrophages, and clinical isolates in peripheral blood mononuclear cells. The concentration of drug necessary to effect viral replication by 50 percent (EC50) ranged from 3.7 to 5.8 μM (1 μM = 0.28 mcg/mL) and 0.07 to 1 μM against HIV-1IIIB and HIV-1BaL, respectively, and was 0.26 ± 0.18 μM against eight clinical isolates. The EC50 values of abacavir against different HIV-1 clades (A-G) ranged from 0.0015 to 1.05 μM, and against HIV-2 isolates, from 0.024 to 0.49 μM. Abacavir had synergistic activity in cell culture in combination with the nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NRTI) zidovudine, the non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NNRTI) nevirapine, and the protease inhibitor (PI) amprenavir; and additive activity in combination with the NRTIs didanosine, emtricitabine, lamivudine, stavudine, tenofovir, and zalcitabine. Ribavirin (50 μM) had no effect on the anti–HIV-1 activity of abacavir in cell culture.

 

HIV-1 isolates with reduced susceptibility to abacavir have been selected in cell culture and were also obtained from subjects treated with abacavir. Genotypic analysis of isolates selected in cell culture and recovered from abacavir-treated subjects demonstrated that amino acid substitutions K65R, L74V, Y115F, and M184V/I in RT contributed to abacavir resistance. In a trial of therapy-naive adults receiving abacavir 600 mg once daily (n = 384) or 300 mg twice daily (n = 386), in a background regimen of lamivudine 300 mg once daily and efavirenz 600 mg once daily (CNA30021), the incidence of virologic failure at 48 weeks was similar between the two groups (11% in both arms). Genotypic (n = 38) and phenotypic analyses (n = 35) of virologic failure isolates from this trial showed that the RT substitutions that emerged during abacavir once daily and twice daily therapy were K65R, L74V, Y115F, and M184V/I. The substitution M184V/I was the most commonly observed substitution in virologic failure isolates from subjects receiving abacavir once daily (56%, 10/18) and twice daily (40%, 8/20).

Thirty-nine percent (7/18) of the isolates from subjects who experienced virologic failure in the abacavir once daily arm had a greater than 2.5-fold decrease in abacavir susceptibility with a median-fold decrease of 1.3 (range: 0.5 to 11) compared with 29% (5/17) of the failure isolates in the twice daily arm with a median-fold decrease of 0.92 (range: 0.7 to 13).

 

Cross-resistance has been observed among NRTIs. Isolates containing abacavir resistance-associated substitutions, namely, K65R, L74V, Y115F, and M184V, exhibited cross-resistance to didanosine, emtricitabine, lamivudine, tenofovir, and zalcitabine in cell culture and in subjects. The K65R substitution can confer resistance to abacavir, didanosine, emtricitabine, lamivudine, stavudine, tenofovir, and zalcitabine; the L74V substitution can confer resistance to abacavir, didanosine, and zalcitabine; and the M184V substitution can confer resistance to abacavir, didanosine, emtricitabine, lamivudine, and zalcitabine. An increasing number of thymidine analogue mutations (TAMs: M41L, D67N, K70R, L210W, T215Y/F, K219E/R/H/Q/N) is associated with a progressive reduction in abacavir susceptibility.

 

NONCLINICAL TOXICOLOGY

Abacavir was administered orally at three dosage levels to separate groups of mice and rats in 2-year carcinogenicity studies. Results showed an increase in the incidence of malignant and non-malignant tumors. Malignant tumors occurred in the preputial gland of males and the clitoral gland of females of both species, and in the liver of female rats. In addition, non-malignant tumors also occurred in the liver and thyroid gland of female rats. These observations were made at systemic exposures in the range of 6 to 32 times the human exposure at the recommended dose. It is not known how predictive the results of rodent carcinogenicity studies may be for humans.

 

Abacavir induced chromosomal aberrations both in the presence and absence of metabolic activation in an in vitro cytogenetic study in human lymphocytes. Abacavir was mutagenic in the absence of metabolic activation, although it was not mutagenic in the presence of metabolic activation in an L5178Y mouse lymphoma assay. Abacavir was clastogenic in males and not clastogenic in females in an in vivo mouse bone marrow micronucleus assay.

Abacavir was not mutagenic in bacterial mutagenicity assays in the presence and absence of metabolic activation.

 

Abacavir had no adverse effects on the mating performance or fertility of male and female rats at a dose approximately 8 times the human exposure at the recommended dose based on body surface area comparisons.

 

Myocardial degeneration was found in mice and rats following administration of abacavir for
2 years. The systemic exposures were equivalent to 7 to 24 times the expected systemic exposure in humans. The clinical relevance of this finding has not been determined.

 

CLINICAL STUDIES

CNA30024 was a multicenter, double-blind, controlled trial in which 649 HIV-1-infected, therapy-naive adults were randomized and received either abacavir (300 mg twice daily), lamivudine (150 mg twice daily), and efavirenz (600 mg once daily); or zidovudine (300 mg twice daily), lamivudine (150 mg twice daily), and efavirenz (600 mg once daily). The duration of double-blind treatment was at least 48 weeks. Trial participants were male (81%), Caucasian (51%), black (21%), and Hispanic (26%). The median age was 35 years; the median pretreatment CD4+ cell count was 264 cells/mm3, and median plasma HIV-1 RNA was 4.79 log10 copies/mL. The outcomes of randomized treatment are provided in Table 7.

Table 7. Outcomes of Randomized Treatment Through Week 48 (CNA30024)
OutcomeAbacavir plus
Lamivudine plus Efavirenz
(n = 324)
Zidovudine plus Lamivudine
plus Efavirenz
(n = 325)
Responder*69% (73%) 69% (71%)
Virologic failures6%4%
Discontinued due to adverse reactions14%16%
Discontinued due to other reasons10%11%

After 48 weeks of therapy, the median CD4+ cell count increases from baseline were 209 cells/mm3 in the group receiving abacavir and 155 cells/mm3 in the zidovudine group. Through Week 48, eight subjects (2%) in the group receiving abacavir (five CDC classification C events and three deaths) and five subjects (2%) on the zidovudine arm (three CDC classification C events and two deaths) experienced clinical disease progression.

CNA3005 was a multicenter, double-blind, controlled trial in which 562 HIV-1-infected, therapy-naive adults were randomized to receive either abacavir (300 mg twice daily) plus COMBIVIR®** (lamivudine 150 mg/zidovudine 300 mg twice daily), or indinavir (800 mg 3 times a day) plus COMBIVIR®** twice daily. The trial was stratified at randomization by pre-entry plasma HIV-1 RNA 10,000 to 100,000 copies/mL and plasma HIV-1 RNA greater than 100,000 copies/mL. Trial participants were male (87%), Caucasian (73%), black (15%), and Hispanic (9%). At baseline the median age was 36 years; the median baseline CD4+ cell count was 360 cells/mm3, and median baseline plasma HIV-1 RNA was 4.8 log10 copies/mL. Proportions of subjects with plasma HIV-1 RNA less than 400 copies/mL (using Roche AMPLICOR HIV-1 MONITOR Test) through 48 weeks of treatment are summarized in Table 8.

Table 8. Outcomes of Randomized Treatment Through Week 48 (CNA3005)
OutcomeAbacavir plus
Lamivudine/Zidovudine
(n = 262)
Indinavir plus
Lamivudine/Zidovudine
(n = 265)
Responder*49%50%
Virologic failures31%28%
Discontinued due to adverse reactions10%12%
Discontinued due to other reasons11%10%

Treatment response by plasma HIV-1 RNA strata is shown in Table 9.

Table 9. Proportions of Responders Through Week 48 By Screening Plasma HIV-1 RNA Levels (CNA3005)
Screening HIV-1 RNA
(copies/mL)
Abacavir plus
Lamivudine/Zidovudine
(n = 262)
Indinavir plus
Lamivudine/Zidovudine
(n = 265)
< 400 copies/mLn< 400 copies/mLn
≥ 10,000 to ≤ 100,00050%16648%165
> 100,00048%9652%100

In subjects with baseline viral load greater than 100,000 copies/mL, percentages of subjects with HIV-1 RNA levels less than 50 copies/mL were 31% in the group receiving abacavir versus 45% in the group receiving indinavir.

Through Week 48, an overall mean increase in CD4+ cell count of about 150 cells/mm3 was observed in both treatment arms. Through Week 48, nine subjects (3.4%) in the group receiving abacavir (six CDC classification C events and three deaths) and three subjects (1.5%) in the group receiving indinavir (two CDC classification C events and one death) experienced clinical disease progression.

CNA30021 was an international, multicenter, double-blind, controlled trial in which 770 HIV-1-infected, therapy-naive adults were randomized and received either abacavir 600 mg once daily or abacavir 300 mg twice daily, both in combination with lamivudine 300 mg once daily and efavirenz 600 mg once daily. The double-blind treatment duration was at least 48 weeks. Trial participants had a mean age of 37 years; were male (81%), Caucasian (54%), black (27%), and American Hispanic (15%). The median baseline CD4+ cell count was 262 cells/mm3 (range: 21 to 918 cells/mm3) and the median baseline plasma HIV-1 RNA was 4.89 log10 copies/mL (range: 2.6 to 6.99 log10 copies/mL).

The outcomes of randomized treatment are provided in Table 10.

Table 10. Outcomes of Randomized Treatment Through Week 48 (CNA30021)
OutcomeAbacavir
600 mg q.d. plus EPIVIR®** plus Efavirenz
(n = 384)
Abacavir
300 mg b.i.d. plus EPIVIR®** plus Efavirenz
(n = 386)
Responder*64% (71%)65% (72%)
Virologic failures11% (5%)11% (5%)
Discontinued due to adverse reactions13%11%
Discontinued due to other reasons11%13%

After 48 weeks of therapy, the median CD4+ cell count increases from baseline were 188 cells/mm3 in the group receiving abacavir 600 mg once daily and 200 cells/mm3 in the group receiving abacavir 300 mg twice daily. Through Week 48, six subjects (2%) in the group receiving abacavir 600 mg once daily (four CDC classification C events and two deaths) and ten subjects (3%) in the group receiving abacavir 300 mg twice daily (seven CDC classification C events and three deaths) experienced clinical disease progression. None of the deaths were attributed to trial medications.

 

CNA3006 was a randomized, double-blind trial comparing abacavir 8 mg/kg twice daily plus lamivudine 4 mg/kg twice daily plus zidovudine 180 mg/m2 twice daily versus lamivudine 4 mg/kg twice daily plus zidovudine 180 mg/m2 twice daily. Two hundred and five therapy-experienced pediatric subjects were enrolled: female (56%), Caucasian (17%), black (50%), Hispanic (30%), median age of 5.4 years, baseline CD4+ cell percent greater than 15% (median = 27%), and median baseline plasma HIV-1 RNA of 4.6 log10 copies/mL. Eighty percent and 55% of subjects had prior therapy with zidovudine and lamivudine, respectively, most often in combination. The median duration of prior nucleoside analogue therapy was 2 years. At 16 weeks the proportion of subjects responding based on plasma HIV-1 RNA less than or equal to 400 copies/mL was significantly higher in subjects receiving abacavir plus lamivudine plus zidovudine compared with subjects receiving lamivudine plus zidovudine, 13% versus 2%, respectively. Median plasma HIV-1 RNA changes from baseline were -0.53 log10 copies/mL in the group receiving abacavir plus lamivudine plus zidovudine compared with -0.21 log10 copies/mL in the group receiving lamivudine plus zidovudine. Median CD4+ cell count increases from baseline were 69 cells/mm3 in the group receiving abacavir plus lamivudine plus zidovudine and 9 cells/mm3 in the group receiving lamivudine plus zidovudine.

 


3
Subjects achieved and maintained confirmed HIV-1 RNA ≤ 50 copies/mL (< 400 copies/mL) through Week 48 (Roche AMPLICOR Ultrasensitive HIV-1 MONITOR
4
Includes viral rebound, insufficient viral response according to the investigator, and failure to achieve confirmed ≤ 50 copies/mL by Week 48.
5
Includes consent withdrawn, lost to follow up, protocol violations, those with missing data, clinical progression, and other.
6
Subjects achieved and maintained confirmed HIV-1 RNA < 400 copies/mL.
7
Includes viral rebound and failure to achieve confirmed < 400 copies/mL by Week 48.
8
Includes consent withdrawn, lost to follow up, protocol violations, those with missing data, clinical progression, and other.
9
Subjects achieved and maintained confirmed HIV-1 RNA < 50 copies/mL (<400 copies/mL) through Week 48 (Roche AMPLICOR Ultrasensitive HIV-1 MONITOR standard test version 1.0).
10
Includes viral rebound, failure to achieve confirmed < 50 copies/mL (< 400 copies/mL) by Week 48, and insufficient viral load response.
11
Includes consent withdrawn, lost to follow up, protocol violations, clinical progression, and other.

REFERENCES

  1. Data Collection on Adverse Events of Anti-HIV Drugs (D:A:D) Study Group. Lancet. 2008;371 (9622):1417-1426.

 

HOW SUPPLIED

Abacavir Tablets, USP are available containing abacavir sulfate, USP equivalent to 300 mg of abacavir.

The 300 mg tablets are peach film-coated, capsule shaped, scored tablets debossed with M on one side of the score and 120 on the other side of the score on one side of the tablet and blank on the other side. They are available as follows:

NDC 0378-4105-91
carton of one bottle containing 60 tablets

Store at 20° to 25°C (68° to 77°F). [See USP Controlled Room Temperature.]

Dispense in original container with attached prescribing information that contains the Medication Guide and a Warning Card.

 

INFORMATION FOR PATIENTS

See FDA-approved patient labeling (Medication Guide)

 

Hypersensitivity Reaction: Inform patients:

Lactic Acidosis/Hepatomegaly: Inform patients that some HIV medicines, including abacavir tablets, can cause a rare, but serious condition called lactic acidosis with liver enlargement (hepatomegaly) [see Boxed Warning, Warnings and Precautions (5.2)].

Redistribution/Accumulation of Body Fat: Inform patients that redistribution or accumulation of body fat may occur in patients receiving antiretroviral therapy and that the cause and long-term health effects of these conditions are not known at this time [see Warnings and Precautions (5.4)].

Information About HIV-1 Infection: Abacavir is not a cure for HIV-1 infection and patients may continue to experience illnesses associated with HIV-1 infection, including opportunistic infections. Patients should remain under the care of a physician when using abacavir tablets.

Patients should be advised to avoid doing things that can spread HIV-1 infection to others.

Patients should be informed to take all HIV medications exactly as prescribed.

 

SPL MEDGUIDE

MEDICATION GUIDE
ABACAVIR TABLETS, USP
(a bak′ a vir sul′ fate)
300 mg

Read this Medication Guide before you start taking abacavir tablets and each time you get a refill. There may be new information. This information does not take the place of talking to your healthcare provider about your medical condition or your treatment. Be sure to carry your Abacavir Tablets Warning Card with you at all times.

What is the most important information I should know about abacavir tablets?

1. Serious allergic reaction (hypersensitivity reaction). Abacavir tablets contain abacavir (also contained in EPZICOM®** and TRIZIVIR®**). Patients taking abacavir tablets may have a serious allergic reaction (hypersensitivity reaction) that can cause death. Your risk of this allergic reaction is much higher if you have a gene variation called HLA-B*5701. Your healthcare provider can determine with a blood test if you have this gene variation.

If you get a symptom from two or more of the following groups while taking abacavir tablets, call your healthcare provider right away to find out if you should stop taking abacavir tablets.

Symptom(s)
Group 1 Fever
Group 2 Rash
Group 3 Nausea, vomiting, diarrhea, abdominal (stomach area) pain
Group 4 Generally ill feeling, extreme tiredness, or achiness
Group 5 Shortness of breath, cough, sore throat

 

A list of these symptoms is on the Warning Card your pharmacist gives you. Carry this Warning Card with you at all times.

If you stop abacavir tablets because of an allergic reaction, never take abacavir tablets (abacavir sulfate) or any other abacavir-containing medicine (EPZICOM®** and TRIZIVIR®**) again. If you take abacavir tablets or any other abacavir-containing medicine again after you have had an allergic reaction, within hours you may get life threatening symptoms that may include very low blood pressure or death. If you stop abacavir tablets for any other reason, even for a few days, and you are not allergic to abacavir, talk with your healthcare provider before taking it again. Taking abacavir tablets again can cause a serious allergic or life threatening reaction, even if you never had an allergic reaction to it before.

If your healthcare provider tells you that you can take abacavir again, start taking it when you are around medical help or people who can call a healthcare provider if you need one.

2. Lactic Acidosis (buildup of acid in the blood). Some human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) medicines, including abacavir tablets, can cause a rare but serious condition called lactic acidosis. Lactic acidosis is a serious medical emergency that can cause death and must be treated in the hospital.

Call your healthcare provider right away if you get any of the following signs or symptoms of lactic acidosis:

3. Serious liver problems. Some people who have taken medicines like abacavir tablets have developed serious liver problems called hepatotoxicity, with liver enlargement (hepatomegaly) and fat in the liver (steatosis). Hepatomegaly with steatosis is a serious medical emergency that can cause death.

Call your healthcare provider right away if you get any of the following signs or symptoms of liver problems:

You may be more likely to get lactic acidosis or serious liver problems if you are female, very overweight, or have been taking nucleoside analogue medicines for a long time.

What is abacavir?

Abacavir is a prescription medicine used to treat HIV infection. Abacavir is a medicine called a nucleoside analogue reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NRTI). Abacavir is always used with other anti-HIV medicines. When used in combination with these other medicines, abacavir helps lower the amount of HIV in your blood.

Who should not take abacavir tablets?

Do not take abacavir tablets if you:

What should I tell my healthcare provider before taking abacavir tablets?

Before you take abacavir tablets, tell your healthcare provider if you:

Especially tell your healthcare provider if you take:

Ask your healthcare provider if you are not sure if you take one of the medicines listed above.

Abacavir tablets may affect the way other medicines work, and other medicines may affect how abacavir tablets work.

Know the medicines you take. Keep a list of your medicines with you to show to your healthcare provider and pharmacist when you get a new medicine.

How should I take abacavir tablets?

What are the possible side effects of abacavir tablets?

These changes may include:

The most common side effects of abacavir in adults include:

The most common side effects of abacavir in children include:

Tell your healthcare provider if you have any side effect that bothers you or that does not go away.

These are not all the possible side effects of abacavir tablets. For more information, ask your healthcare provider or pharmacist.

Call your doctor for medical advice about side effects. You may report side effects to FDA at 1-800-FDA-1088.

How should I store abacavir tablets?

General information for safe and effective use of abacavir tablets

Avoid doing things that can spread HIV-1 infection to others.

Medicines are sometimes prescribed for purposes other than those listed in a Medication Guide. Do not use abacavir for a condition for which it was not prescribed. Do not give abacavir tablets to other people, even if they have the same symptoms that you have. It may harm them.

This Medication Guide summarizes the most important information about abacavir tablets. If you would like more information, talk with your healthcare provider. You can ask your healthcare provider or pharmacist for the information that is written for healthcare professionals.

For more information call Mylan Pharmaceuticals Inc. at 1-877-4-INFO-RX (1-877-446-3679).

What are the ingredients in abacavir tablets?

Active ingredient: abacavir sulfate, USP

Inactive ingredients: colloidal silicon dioxide, hypromellose, magnesium stearate, microcrystalline cellulose, polyethylene glycol, red iron oxide, sodium starch glycolate, titanium dioxide and yellow iron oxide.

This Medication Guide has been approved by the US Food and Drug Administration.

** The brand names mentioned are registered trademarks of their respective manufacturers.
Manufactured for:
Mylan Pharmaceuticals Inc.
Morgantown, WV 26505 U.S.A.

Manufactured in India by:
Mylan Laboratories Limited
Hyderabad — 500 034, India
Code No.: MH/DRUGS/25/NKD/89

75050142
REVISED JULY 2012
MX:ABCV:R3m

 

PACKAGE LABEL.PRINCIPAL DISPLAY PANEL SECTION

DRUG: Abacavir Sulfate
GENERIC: abacavir sulfate
DOSAGE: TABLET, FILM COATED
ADMINSTRATION: ORAL
NDC: 49349-999-02
STRENGTH:300 mg
COLOR: orange
SHAPE: OVAL
SCORE: Two even pieces
SIZE: 18 mm
IMPRINT: 60
QTY: 60

MM3
MM4
ABACAVIR SULFATE 
abacavir sulfate tablet, film coated
Product Information
Product TypeHUMAN PRESCRIPTION DRUG LABELItem Code (Source)NDC:49349-999(NDC:0378-4105)
Route of AdministrationORALDEA Schedule    
Active Ingredient/Active Moiety
Ingredient NameBasis of StrengthStrength
ABACAVIR SULFATE (ABACAVIR) ABACAVIR300 mg
Inactive Ingredients
Ingredient NameStrength
SILICON DIOXIDE 
HYPROMELLOSES 
MAGNESIUM STEARATE 
CELLULOSE, MICROCRYSTALLINE 
POLYETHYLENE GLYCOLS 
FERRIC OXIDE RED 
SODIUM STARCH GLYCOLATE TYPE A POTATO 
TITANIUM DIOXIDE 
FERRIC OXIDE YELLOW 
Product Characteristics
ColororangeScore2 pieces
ShapeOVAL (TABLET, FILM COATED) Size18mm
FlavorImprint Code M;120
Contains    
Packaging
#Item CodePackage DescriptionMarketing Start DateMarketing End Date
1NDC:49349-999-0260 in 1 BLISTER PACK
Marketing Information
Marketing CategoryApplication Number or Monograph CitationMarketing Start DateMarketing End Date
ANDAANDA09129402/27/2013
Labeler - REMEDYREPACK INC. (829572556)

Revised: 2/2013
Document Id: fa1899b5-af44-46da-897c-2db5bc1e02c4
Set id: d4c622c8-73ba-49b4-9ac5-81bf87702775
Version: 2
Effective Time: 20130227
 
REMEDYREPACK INC.