ARIMIDEX®AnastrozoleTABLETS

arimidex (Anastrozoletablet 
[AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP]

DESCRIPTION

ARIMIDEX® (anastrozole) tablets for oral administration contain 1 mg of anastrozole, a non-steroidal aromatase inhibitor. It is chemically described as 1,3-Benzenediacetonitrile, a, a, a', a'-tetramethyl-5-(1H-1,2,4-triazol-1-ylmethyl). Its molecular formula is C17H19N5 and its structural formula is:

Image from Drug Label Content

Anastrozole is an off-white powder with a molecular weight of 293.4. Anastrozole has moderate aqueous solubility (0.5 mg/mL at 25°C); solubility is independent of pH in the physiological range. Anastrozole is freely soluble in methanol, acetone, ethanol, and tetrahydrofuran, and very soluble in acetonitrile.

Each tablet contains as inactive ingredients: lactose, magnesium stearate, hydroxypropylmethylcellulose, polyethylene glycol, povidone, sodium starch glycolate, and titanium dioxide.

CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY

Mechanism of Action

Many breast cancers have estrogen receptors and growth of these tumors can be stimulated by estrogen. In postmenopausal women, the principal source of circulating estrogen (primarily estradiol) is conversion of adrenally-generated androstenedione to estrone by aromatase in peripheral tissues, such as adipose tissue, with further conversion of estrone to estradiol. Many breast cancers also contain aromatase; the importance of tumor-generated estrogens is uncertain.

Treatment of breast cancer has included efforts to decrease estrogen levels, by ovariectomy premenopausally and by use of anti-estrogens and progestational agents both pre- and post-menopausally; and these interventions lead to decreased tumor mass or delayed progression of tumor growth in some women.

Anastrozole is a potent and selective non-steroidal aromatase inhibitor. It significantly lowers serum estradiol concentrations and has no detectable effect on formation of adrenal corticosteroids or aldosterone.

Pharmacokinetics

Inhibition of aromatase activity is primarily due to anastrozole, the parent drug. Studies with radiolabeled drug have demonstrated that orally administered anastrozole is well absorbed into the systemic circulation with 83 to 85% of the radiolabel recovered in urine and feces. Food does not affect the extent of absorption. Elimination of anastrozole is primarily via hepatic metabolism (approximately 85%) and to a lesser extent, renal excretion (approximately 11%), and anastrozole has a mean terminal elimination half-life of approximately 50 hours in postmenopausal women. The major circulating metabolite of anastrozole, triazole, lacks pharmacologic activity. The pharmacokinetic parameters are similar in patients and in healthy postmenopausal volunteers. The pharmacokinetics of anastrozole are linear over the dose range of 1 to 20 mg and do not change with repeated dosing. Consistent with the approximately 2-day terminal elimination half-life, plasma concentrations approach steady-state levels at about 7 days of once daily dosing and steady-state levels are approximately three- to four-fold higher than levels observed after a single dose of ARIMIDEX. Anastrozole is 40% bound to plasma proteins in the therapeutic range.

Metabolism and Excretion

Studies in postmenopausal women demonstrated that anastrozole is extensively metabolized with about 10% of the dose excreted in the urine as unchanged drug within 72 hours of dosing, and the remainder (about 60% of the dose) is excreted in urine as metabolites. Metabolism of anastrozole occurs by N-dealkylation, hydroxylation and glucuronidation. Three metabolites of anastrozole have been identified in human plasma and urine. The known metabolites are triazole, a glucuronide conjugate of hydroxy-anastrozole, and a glucuronide of anastrozole itself. Several minor (less than 5% of the radioactive dose) metabolites have not been identified.

Because renal elimination is not a significant pathway of elimination, total body clearance of anastrozole is unchanged even in severe (creatinine clearance less than 30 mL/min/1.73m2) renal impairment, dosing adjustment in patients with renal dysfunction is not necessary (see Special Populations and DOSAGE AND ADMINISTRATION sections). Dosage adjustment is also unnecessary in patients with stable hepatic cirrhosis (see Special Populations and DOSAGE AND ADMINISTRATION sections).

Special Populations

Geriatric

Anastrozole pharmacokinetics have been investigated in postmenopausal female volunteers and patients with breast cancer. No age related effects were seen over the range <50 to >80 years.

Race

Estradiol and estrone sulfate levels were similar between Japanese and Caucasian postmenopausal women who received 1 mg of anastrozole daily for 16 days. Anastrozole mean steady-state minimum plasma concentrations in Caucasian and Japanese postmenopausal women were 25.7 and 30.4 ng/mL, respectively.

Renal Insufficiency

Anastrozole pharmacokinetics have been investigated in subjects with renal insufficiency. Anastrozole renal clearance decreased proportionally with creatinine clearance and was approximately 50% lower in volunteers with severe renal impairment (creatinine clearance < 30 mL/min/1.73m2) compared to controls. Since only about 10% of anastrozole is excreted unchanged in the urine, the reduction in renal clearance did not influence the total body clearance (See DOSAGE AND ADMINISTRATION).

Hepatic Insufficiency

Hepatic metabolism accounts for approximately 85% of anastrozole elimination. Anastrozole pharmacokinetics have been investigated in subjects with hepatic cirrhosis related to alcohol abuse. The apparent oral clearance (CL/F) of anastrozole was approximately 30% lower in subjects with stable hepatic cirrhosis than in control subjects with normal liver function. However, plasma anastrozole concentrations in the subjects with hepatic cirrhosis were within the range of concentrations seen in normal subjects across all clinical trials (see DOSAGE AND ADMINISTRATION), so that no dosage adjustment is needed.

Drug-Drug Interactions

Anastrozole inhibited reactions catalyzed by cytochrome P450 1A2, 2C8/9, and 3A4 in vitro with Ki values which were approximately 30 times higher than the mean steady-state Cmax values observed following a 1 mg daily dose. Anastrozole had no inhibitory effect on reactions catalyzed by cytochrome P450 2A6 or 2D6 in vitro. Administration of a single 30 mg/kg or multiple 10 mg/kg doses of anastrozole to healthy subjects had no effect on the clearance of antipyrine or urinary recovery of antipyrine metabolites. Based on these in vitro and in vivo results, it is unlikely that co-administration of ARIMIDEX 1 mg with other drugs will result in clinically significant inhibition of cytochrome P450 mediated metabolism.

In a study conducted in 16 male volunteers, anastrozole did not alter the pharmacokinetics as measured by Cmax and AUC, and anticoagulant activity as measured by prothrombin time, activated partial thromboplastine time, and thrombin time of both R- and S-warfarin.

Co-administration of anastrozole and tamoxifen in breast cancer patients reduced anastrozole plasma concentration by 27% compared to those achieved with anastrozole alone; however, the coadministration did not affect the pharmacokinetics of tamoxifen or N-desmethyltamoxifen (see PRECAUTIONS -Drug Interactions).

Pharmacodynamics

Effect on Estradiol

Mean serum concentrations of estradiol were evaluated in multiple daily dosing trials with 0.5, 1, 3, 5, and 10 mg of ARIMIDEX in postmenopausal women with advanced breast cancer. Clinically significant suppression of serum estradiol was seen with all doses. Doses of 1 mg and higher resulted in suppression of mean serum concentrations of estradiol to the lower limit of detection (3.7 pmol/L). The recommended daily dose, ARIMIDEX 1 mg, reduced estradiol by approximately 70% within 24 hours and by approximately 80% after 14 days of daily dosing. Suppression of serum estradiol was maintained for up to 6 days after cessation of daily dosing with ARIMIDEX 1 mg.

The effect of ARIMIDEX on estradiol levels in premenopausal women has not been studied. Because aromatization of adrenal androgens is not a significant source of estradiol in premenopausal women (women with functioning ovaries as evidenced by menstruation and/or premenopausal LH, FSH and estradiol levels), ARIMIDEX would not be expected to lower estradiol levels in premenopausal women.

Effect on Corticosteroids

In multiple daily dosing trials with 3, 5, and 10 mg, the selectivity of anastrozole was assessed by examining effects on corticosteroid synthesis. For all doses, anastrozole did not affect cortisol or aldosterone secretion at baseline or in response to ACTH. No glucocorticoid or mineralocorticoid replacement therapy is necessary with anastrozole.

Other Endocrine Effects

In multiple daily dosing trials with 5 and 10 mg, thyroid stimulating hormone (TSH) was measured; there was no increase in TSH during the administration of ARIMIDEX. ARIMIDEX does not possess direct progestogenic, androgenic, or estrogenic activity in animals, but does perturb the circulating levels of progesterone, androgens, and estrogens.

Clinical Studies

Adjuvant Treatment of Breast Cancer in Postmenopausal Women

A multicenter, double-blind trial (ATAC) randomized 9,366 postmenopausal women with operable breast cancer to adjuvant treatment with ARIMIDEX 1 mg daily, tamoxifen 20 mg daily, or a combination of the two treatments for five years or until recurrence of the disease.

The primary endpoint of the trial was disease-free survival (ie, time to occurrence of a distant or local recurrence, or contralateral breast cancer or death from any cause). Secondary endpoints of the trial included distant disease-free survival, the incidence of contralateral breast cancer and overall survival. At a median follow-up of 33 months, the combination of ARIMIDEX and tamoxifen did not demonstrate any efficacy benefit when compared with tamoxifen in all patients as well as in the hormone receptor positive subpopulation. This treatment arm was discontinued from the trial.

Demographic and other baseline characteristics were similar among the three treatment groups (see Table 1).

Table 1 - Demographic and Baseline Characteristics for ATAC Trial
*
§
*
Includes all other combinations of ER and PgR receptor status unknown
Among the patients who had breast conservation, radiotherapy was administered to 95.0% of patients in the ARIMIDEX arm, 94.1% in the tamoxifen arm and 94.5% in the ARIMIDEX plus tamoxifen arm.
N=Number of patients randomized to the treatment
§
The combination arm was discontinued due to lack of efficacy benefit at 33 months of follow-up
Includes patients who were estrogen receptor (ER) positive or progesterone receptor (PgR) positive, or both positive
#
Includes patients with both ER negative and PgR negative receptor status

Demographic Characteristic

ARIMIDEX

1 mg(N=3125)

Tamoxifen

20 mg

(N=3116)

ARIMIDEX 1 mg

plus Tamoxifen

20 mg§

(N=3125)

Mean age (yrs.)

64.1

64.1

64.3

Age Range (yrs.)

38.1 - 92.8

32.8 − 94.9

37.0 - 92.2

Age Distribution (%)

45 yrs.

0.7

0.4

0.5

5-60 yrs.

34.6

35.0

34.5

60 <70 yrs.

38.0

37.1

37.7

70 yrs.

26.7

27.4

27.3

Mean Weight (kg)

70.8

71.1

71.3

Receptor Status (%)

Positive

83.5

83.1

84.0

Negative#

7.4

8.0

7.0

Other*

8.8

8.6

9.0

Other Treatment (%) prior to Randomization

Mastectomy

47.8

47.3

48.1

Breast conservation

52.3

52.8

51.9

Axillary surgery

95.5

95.7

95.2

Radiotherapy

63.3

62.5

61.9

Chemotherapy

22.3

20.8

20.8

Neoadjuvant Tamoxifen

1.6

1.6

1.7

Primary Tumor Size (%)

T1 (≤2 cm)

63.9

62.9

64.1

T2 (>2 cm and ≤5 cm)

32.6

34.2

32.9

T3 (>5 cm)

2.7

2.2

2.3

Nodal Status (%)

Node positive

34.9

33.6

33.5

1-3 (# of nodes)

24.4

24.4

24.3

4-9

7.5

6.4

6.8

>9

2.9

2.7

2.3

Tumor Grade (%)

Well-differentiated

20.8

20.5

21.2

Moderately differentiated

46.8

47.8

46.5

Poorly/undifferentiated

23.7

23.3

23.7

Not assessed/recorded

8.7

8.4

8.5

Patients in the two monotherapy arms of the ATAC trial were treated for a median of 60 months (5 years) and followed for a median of 68 months. Disease-free survival in the intent-to-treat population was statistically significantly improved [Hazard Ratio (HR) = 0.87, 95% CI: 0.78, 0.97, p=0.0127 in the ARIMIDEX arm compared to the tamoxifen arm. In the hormone receptor-positive subpopulation representing about 84% of the trial patients, disease-free survival was also statistically significantly improved (HR =0.83, 95% CI: 0.73, 0.94, p=0.0049) in the ARIMIDEX arm compared to the tamoxifen arm.

Image from Drug Label Content

Figure 1 - Disease-free Survival Kaplan Meier Survival Curve for all Patients Randomized to ARIMIDEX or Tamoxifen Monotherapy in the ATAC trial (Intent-to-treat)

Image from Drug Label Content

Figure 2 - Disease-free Survival for Hormone Receptor-Positive Subpopulation of Patients Randomized to ARIMIDEX or Tamoxifen Monotherapy in the ATAC Trial

The survival data with 68 months follow-up is presented in Table 3.

In the group of patients who had previous adjuvant chemotherapy (N=698 for ARIMIDEX and N=647 for tamoxifen), the hazard ratio for disease-free survival was 0.91 (95% CI: 0.73 to 1.13) in the Arimidex arm compared to the tamoxifen arm. For patients who were 65 years of age and older (N=1413 for ARIMIDEX and N=1410 for tamoxifen), the hazard ratio for disease-free survival was 0.93 (95% CI: 0.80 to1.08) in the Arimidex arm compared to the tamoxifen arm.

The frequency of individual events in the intent-to-treat population and the hormone receptor-positive subpopulation are described in Table 2.

Table 2 - All Recurrence and Death Events§

Intent-To-Treat

Hormone Receptor-Positive Subpopulation

ARIMIDEX

1mg

(*N=3125)

Tamoxifen

20 mg

(*N=3116)

ARIMIDEX

1 mg

(*N=2618)

Tamoxifen

20 mg

(*N=2598)

Number (%) of Patients

Number (%) of Patients

*
*
N=Number of patients randomized
*The combination arm was discontinued due to lack of efficacy benefit at 33 months of follow-up.
Patients may fall into more than one category

Median Duration of Therapy (mo)

60

60

60

60

Median Efficacy Follow-up (mo)

68

68

68

68

Loco-regional recurrence

119 (3.8)

149 (4.8)

76 (2.9)

101 (3.9)

Contralateral breast cancer

35 (1.1)

59 (1.9)

26 (1.0)

54 (2.1)

Invasive

27 (0.9)

52 (1.7)

21 (0.8)

48 (1.8)

Ductal carcinoma in situ

8 (0.3)

6 (0.2)

5 (0.2)

5 (0.2)

Unknown

0

1 (<0.1)

0

1 (<0.1)

Distant recurrencea

324 (10.4)

375 (12.0)

226 (8.6)

265 (10.2)

Death from Any Cause

411 (13.2)

420 (13.5)

296 (11.3)

301 (11.6)

Death breast cancer

218 (7.0)

248 (8.0)

138 (5.3)

160 (6.2)

Death other reason (including unknown)

193 (6.2)

172 (5.5)

158 (6.0)

141 (5.4)

A summary of the study efficacy results is provided in Table 3.

Table 3 - ATAC Efficacy Summary

Intent-To-Treat Population

Hormone Receptor-Positive Subpopulation

ARIMIDEX

1mg

(N=3125)

Tamoxifen

20 mg

(N=3116)

ARIMIDEX

1 mg

(N=2618)

Tamoxifen

20 mg

(N=2598)

Number of Events

Number of Events

*
*
*The combination arm was discontinued due to lack of efficacy benefit at 33 months of follow-up.

Disease-free Survival

575

651

424

497

Hazard ratio

0.87

0.78 to 0.97

0.0127

0.83

0.73 to 0.94

0.0049

2-sided 95% CI

p-value

Distant Disease-free Survival

500

530

370

394

Hazard ratio

0.94

0.83 to 1.06

0.93

0.80 to 1.07

2-sided 95% CI

Overall Survival

411

420

296

301

Hazard ratio

0.97

0.85 to 1.12

0.97

0.83 to 1.14

2-sided 95% CI

First Line Therapy in Postmenopausal Women with Advanced Breast Cancer

Two double-blind, well-controlled clinical studies of similar design (0030, a North American study and 0027, a predominately European study) were conducted to assess the efficacy of ARIMIDEX compared with tamoxifen as first-line therapy for hormone receptor positive or hormone receptor unknown locally advanced or metastatic breast cancer in postmenopausal women. A total of 1021 patients between the ages of 30 and 92 years old were randomized to receive trial treatment. Patients were randomized to receive 1 mg of ARIMIDEX once daily or 20 mg of tamoxifen once daily. The primary end points for both trials were time to tumor progression, objective tumor response rate, and safety.

Demographics and other baseline characteristics, including patients who had measurable and no measurable disease, patients who were given previous adjuvant therapy, the site of metastatic disease and ethnic origin were similar for the two treatment groups for both trials. The following table summarizes the hormone receptor status at entry for all randomized patients in trials 0030 and 0027.

Table 4

Number (%) of subjects

Trial 0030

Trial 0027

Receptor status

ARIMIDEX

1mg

(N=171)

Tamoxifen

20 mg

(N=182)

ARIMIDEX

1 mg

(N=340)

Tamoxifen

20 mg

(N=328)

*
*
ER = Estrogen receptor
PgR = Progesterone receptor

ER+ and/or PgR+

151 (88.3)

162 (89.0)

154 (45.3)

144 (43.9)

ER unknown, PgR   Unknown

19 (11.1)

20 (11.0)

185 (54.4)

183 (55.8)

For the primary endpoints, trial 0030 showed ARIMIDEX was at least as effective as tamoxifen for objective tumor response rate. ARIMIDEX had a statistically significant advantage over tamoxifen (p=0.006) for time to tumor progression (see Table 5 and Figure 3). Trial 0027 showed ARIMIDEX was at least as effective as tamoxifen for objective tumor response rate and time to tumor progression (See Table 5 and Figure 4).

Table 5 below summarizes the results of trial 0030 and trial 0027 for the primary efficacy endpoints.

Table 5

End point

Trial 0030

Trial 0027

ARIMIDEX

1 mg

(n=171)

Tamoxifen

20 mg

(n=182)

ARIMIDEX

1 mg

(n=340)

Tamoxifen

20 mg

(n=328)

*
§
#
Þ
*
CR = Complete Response
PR = Partial Response
CI = Confidence Interval
§
LCL = Lower Confidence Limit
1Tamoxifen:ARIMIDEX
#
2 Two-sided Log Rank
Þ
3ARIMIDEX:Tamoxifen

Time to progression (TTP)

Median TTP (months)

11.1

5.6

8.2

8.3

Number (%) of subjects who progressed

114 (67%)

138 (76%)

249 (73%)

247 (75%)

Hazard ratio (LCL)1

1.42 (1.15)

1.01 (0.87)

2-sided 95% CI

(1.11, 1.82)

(0.85, 1.20)

p-value2

0.006

0.920

Best objective response rate

Number (%) of subjects wth CR + PR

36 (21.1%)

31 (17.0%)

112 (32.9%)

107 (32.6%)

Odds Ratio (LCL)3

1.30 (0.83)

1.01 (0.77)

Image from Drug Label Content

Figure 3 - Kaplan-Meier probability of time to disease progression for all randomized patients (intent-to-treat) in Trial 0030

Image from Drug Label Content

Figure 4 Kaplan-Meier probability of time to progression for all randomized patients (intent-to-treat) in Trial 0027

Results from the secondary endpoints of time to treatment failure, duration of tumor response, and duration of clinical benefit were supportive of the results of the primary efficacy endpoints. There were too few deaths occurring across treatment groups of both trials to draw conclusions on overall survival differences.

Second Line Therapy in Postmenopausal Women with Advanced Breast Cancer who had Disease Progression following Tamoxifen Therapy

Anastrozole was studied in two well-controlled clinical trials (0004, a North American study; 0005, a predominately European study) in postmenopausal women with advanced breast cancer who had disease progression following tamoxifen therapy for either advanced or early breast cancer. Some of the patients had also received previous cytotoxic treatment. Most patients were ER-positive; a smaller fraction were ER-unknown or ER-negative; the ER-negative patients were eligible only if they had had a positive response to tamoxifen. Eligible patients with measurable and non-measurable disease were randomized to receive either a single daily dose of 1 mg or 10 mg of ARIMIDEX or megestrol acetate 40 mg four times a day. The studies were double-blinded with respect to ARIMIDEX. Time to progression and objective response (only patients with measurable disease could be considered partial responders) rates were the primary efficacy variables. Objective response rates were calculated based on the Union Internationale Contre le Cancer (UICC) criteria. The rate of prolonged (more than 24 weeks) stable disease, the rate of progression, and survival were also calculated.

Both trials included over 375 patients; demographics and other baseline characteristics were similar for the three treatment groups in each trial. Patients in the 0005 trial had responded better to prior tamoxifen treatment. Of the patients entered who had prior tamoxifen therapy for advanced disease (58% in Trial 0004; 57% in Trial 0005), 18% of these patients in Trial 0004 and 42% in Trial 0005 were reported by the primary investigator to have responded. In Trial 0004, 81% of patients were ER-positive, 13% were ER-unknown, and 6% were ER-negative. In Trial 0005, 58% of patients were ER-positive, 37% were ER-unknown, and 5% were ER-negative. In Trial 0004, 62% of patients had measurable disease compared to 79% in Trial 0005. The sites of metastatic disease were similar among treatment groups for each trial. On average, 40% of the patients had soft tissue metastases; 60% had bone metastases; and 40% had visceral (15% liver) metastases.

As shown in the table below, similar results were observed among treatment groups and between the two trials. None of the within-trial differences were statistically significant.

Table 6
*
*
*Surviving Patients

ARIMIDEX

1 mg

ARIMIDEX

10 mg

Megestrol Acetate

160 mg

Trial 0004

(N. America)

(n=128)

(N=130)

(n=128)

Median Fol1ow-up (months)*

31.3

30.9

32.9

Median Time to Death (months)

29.6

25.7

26.7

2 Year Survival Probability (%)

62.0

58.0

53.1

Median Time to Progression (months)

5.7

5.3

5.1

Objective Response (all patients ) (%)

12.5

10.0

10.2

Stable Disease for >24 weeks (%)

35.2

29.2

32.8

Progression (%)

86.7

85.4

90.6

Trial 0005

(Europe, Australia, S. Africa)

(n=135)

(n=118)

(n=125)

Median Follow-up (months)*

31.0

30.9

31.5

Median Time to Death (months)

24.3

24.8

19.8

2 Year Survival Probability (%)

50.5

50.9

39.1

Median Time to Progression (months)

4.4

5.3

3.9

Objective Response (all patients) (%)

12.6

15.3

14.4

Stable Disease for >24 weeks (%)

24.4

25.4

23.2

Progression (%)

91.9

89.8

92.0

More than 1/3 of the patients in each treatment group in both studies had either an objective response or stabilization of their disease for greater than 24 weeks. Among the 263 patients who received ARIMIDEX 1 mg, there were 11 complete responders and 22 partial responders. In patients who had an objective response, more than 80% were still responding at 6 months from randomization and more than 45% were still responding at 12 months from randomization.

When data from the two controlled trials are pooled, the objective response rates and median times to progression and death were similar for patients randomized to ARIMIDEX 1 mg and megestrol acetate. There is, in this data, no indication that ARIMIDEX 10 mg is superior to ARIMIDEX 1 mg.

Table 7

Trials 0004 & 0005

(Pooled Data)

ARIMIDEX

1 mg

N=263

ARIMIDEX

10 mg

N=248

Megestrol Acetate

160 mg

N=253

Median Time to Death (months)

26.7

25.5

22.5

2 Year Survival Probability (%)

56.1

54.6

46.3

Median Time to Progression

4.8

5.3

4.6

Objective Response (all patients) (%)

12.5

12.5

12.3

Objective response rates and median times to progression and death for ARIMIDEX 1 mg were similar to megestrol acetate for women over or under 65. There were too few non-white patients studied to draw conclusions about racial differences in response.

INDICATIONS AND USAGE

ARIMIDEX is indicated for adjuvant treatment of postmenopausal women with hormone receptor-positive early breast cancer.

ARIMIDEX is indicated for the first-line treatment of postmenopausal women with hormone receptor-positive or hormone receptor unknown locally advanced or metastatic breast cancer.

ARIMIDEX is indicated for the treatment of advanced breast cancer in postmenopausal women with disease progression following tamoxifen therapy. Patients with ER-negative disease and patients who did not respond to previous tamoxifen therapy rarely responded to ARIMIDEX.

CONTRAINDICATIONS

ARIMIDEX is contraindicated in any patient who has shown a hypersensitivity reaction to the drug or to any of the excipients.

WARNINGS

ARIMIDEX can cause fetal harm when administered to a pregnant woman. Anastrozole has been found to cross the placenta following oral administration of 0.1 mg/kg in rats and rabbits (about 1 and 1.9 times the recommended human dose, respectively, on a mg/m2 basis). Studies in both rats and rabbits at doses equal to or greater than 0.1 and 0.02 mg/kg/day, respectively (about 1 and 1/3, respectively, the recommended human dose on a mg/m2 basis), administered during the period of organogenesis showed that anastrozole increased pregnancy loss (increased pre- and/or post-implantation loss, increased resorption, and decreased numbers of live fetuses); effects were dose related in rats. Placental weights were significantly increased in rats at doses of 0.1 mg/kg/day or more.

Evidence of fetotoxicity, including delayed fetal development (i.e., incomplete ossification and depressed fetal body weights), was observed in rats administered doses of 1 mg/kg/day (which produced plasma anastrozole Cssmax and AUC0-24 hr that were 19 times and 9 times higher than the respective values found in postmenopausal volunteers at the recommended dose). There was no evidence of teratogenicity in rats administered doses up to 1.0 mg/kg/day. In rabbits, anastrozole caused pregnancy failure at doses equal to or greater than 1.0 mg/kg/day (about 16 times the recommended human dose on a mg/m2 basis); there was no evidence of teratogenicity in rabbits administered 0.2 mg/kg/day (about 3 times the recommended human dose on a mg/m2 basis).

There are no adequate and well-controlled studies in pregnant women using ARIMIDEX. If ARIMIDEX is used during pregnancy, or if the patient becomes pregnant while receiving this drug, the patient should be apprised of the potential hazard to the fetus or potential risk for loss of the pregnancy.

PRECAUTIONS

General

ARIMIDEX is not recommended for use in premenopausal women as safety and efficacy has not been established (see CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY, Pharmacodynamics, Effect on Estradiol section).

Before starting treatment with ARIMIDEX, pregnancy must be excluded (see WARNINGS). ARIMIDEX should be administered under the supervision of a qualified physician experienced in the use of anticancer agents.

Laboratory Tests

Results from the ATAC trial bone substudy at 12 and 24 months demonstrated that patients receiving ARIMIDEX had a mean decrease in both lumbar spine and total hip bone mineral density (BMD) compared to baseline. Patients receiving tamoxifen had a mean increase in both lumbar spine and total hip BMD compared to baseline.

Because ARIMIDEX lowers circulating estrogen levels it may cause a reduction in bone mineral density.

During the ATAC trial, more patients receiving ARIMIDEX were reported to have an elevated serum cholesterol compared to patients receiving tamoxifen (9% versus 3.5%, respectively).

Drug Interactions

(See CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY) Anastrozole inhibited in vitro metabolic reactions catalyzed by cytochromes P450 1A2, 2C8/9, and 3A4 but only at relatively high concentrations. Anastrozole did not inhibit P450 2A6 or the polymorphic P450 2D6 in human liver microsomes. Anastrozole did not alter the pharmacokinetics of antipyrine. Although there have been no formal interaction studies other than with antipyrine, based on these in vivo and in vitro studies, it is unlikely that co-administration of a 1 mg dose of ARIMIDEX with other drugs will result in clinically significant drug inhibition of cytochrome P450-mediated metabolism of the other drugs.

An interaction study with warfarin showed no clinically significant effect of anastrozole on warfarin pharmacokinetics or anticoagulant activity.

At a median follow-up of 33 months, the combination of ARIMIDEX and tamoxifen did not demonstrate any efficacy benefit when compared with tamoxifen in all patients as well as in the hormone receptor-positive subpopulation. This treatment arm was discontinued from the trial. Based on clinical and pharmacokinetic results from the ATAC trial, tamoxifen should not be administered with anastrozole (see CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY − Drug Interactions and CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY - Clinical Studies - Adjuvant Treatment of Breast Cancer in Postmenopausal Women subsections). Co-administration of anastrozole and tamoxifen resulted in a reduction of anastrozole plasma levels by 27% compared with those achieved with anastrozole alone.

Estrogen-containing therapies should not be used with ARIMIDEX as they may diminish its pharmacologic action.

Drug/Laboratory Test Interactions

No clinically significant changes in the results of clinical laboratory tests have been observed.

Carcinogenesis

A conventional carcinogenesis study in rats at doses of 1.0 to 25 mg/kg/day (about 10 to 243 times the daily maximum recommended human dose on a mg/m2 basis) administered by oral gavage for up to 2 years revealed an increase in the incidence of hepatocellular adenoma and carcinoma and uterine stromal polyps in females and thyroid adenoma in males at the high dose. A dose related increase was observed in the incidence of ovarian and uterine hyperplasia in females. At 25 mg/kg/day, plasma AUC0-24 hr levels in rats were 110 to 125 times higher than the level exhibited in postmenopausal volunteers at the recommended dose. A separate carcinogenicity study in mice at oral doses of 5 to 50 mg/kg/day (about 24 to 243 times the daily maximum recommended human dose on a mg/m2 basis) for up to 2 years produced an increase in the incidence of benign ovarian stromal, epithelial and granulosa cell tumors at all dose levels. A dose related increase in the incidence of ovarian hyperplasia was also observed in female mice. These ovarian changes are considered to be rodent-specific effects of aromatase inhibition and are of questionable significance to humans. The incidence of lymphosarcoma was increased in males and females at the high dose. At 50 mg/kg/day, plasma AUC levels in mice were 35 to 40 times higher than the level exhibited in postmenopausal volunteers at the recommended dose.

Mutagenesis

ARIMIDEX has not been shown to be mutagenic in in vitro tests (Ames and E. coli bacterial tests, CHO-K1 gene mutation assay) or clastogenic either in vitro (chromosome aberrations in human lymphocytes) or in vivo (micronucleus test in rats).

Impairment of Fertility

Oral administration of anastrozole to female rats (from 2 weeks before mating to pregnancy day 7) produced significant incidence of infertility and reduced numbers of viable pregnancies at 1 mg/kg/day (about 10 times the recommended human dose on a mg/m2 basis and 9 times higher than the AUC0-24 hr found in postmenopausal volunteers at the recommended dose). Pre-implantation loss of ova or fetus was increased at doses equal to or greater than 0.02 mg/kg/day (about one-fifth the recommended human dose on a mg/m2 basis). Recovery of fertility was observed following a 5-week non-dosing period which followed 3 weeks of dosing. It is not known whether these effects observed in female rats are indicative of impaired fertility in humans.

Multiple-dose studies in rats administered anastrozole for 6 months at doses equal to or greater than 1 mg/kg/day (which produced plasma anastrozole Cssmax and AUC0-24 hr that were 19 and 9 times higher than the respective values found in postmenopausal volunteers at the recommended dose) resulted in hypertrophy of the ovaries and the presence of follicular cysts. In addition, hyperplastic uteri were observed in 6-month studies in female dogs administered doses equal to or greater than 1 mg/kg/day (which produced plasma anastrozole Cssmax and AUC0-24 hr that were 22 times and 16 times higher than the respective values found in postmenopausal women at the recommended dose). It is not known whether these effects on the reproductive organs of animals are associated with impaired fertility in premenopausal women.

Pregnancy

Pregnancy Category D

(See WARNINGS)

Nursing Mothers

It is not known if anastrozole is excreted in human milk. Because many drugs are excreted in human milk, caution should be exercised when ARIMIDEX is administered to a nursing woman (See WARNINGS and PRECAUTIONS).

Pediatric Use

The safety and efficacy of ARIMIDEX in pediatric patients have not been established.

Geriatric Use

In studies 0030 and 0027 about 50% of patients were 65 or older. Patients ≥ 65 years of age had moderately better tumor response and time to tumor progression than patients < 65 years of age regardless of randomized treatment. In studies 0004 and 0005 50% of patients were 65 or older. Response rates and time to progression were similar for the over 65 and younger patients.

In the ATAC study, patients who were 65 years of age or older (N=1413 for ARIMIDEX and N=1410 for tamoxifen), the hazard ratio for disease-free survival was 0.93 (95% CI: 0.80, 1.08) for Arimidex compared to tamoxifen.

ADVERSE REACTIONS

Adjuvant Therapy

Adverse reaction data for adjuvant therapy are based on the adjuvant trial (see CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY - Clinical Studies - Adjuvant Treatment of Breast Cancer in Postmenopausal Women). At a median follow-up of 33 months, the combination of ARIMIDEX and tamoxifen did not demonstrate any efficacy benefit when compared with tamoxifen in all patients as well as in the hormone receptor-positive subpopulation. This treatment arm was discontinued from the trial. The median duration of adjuvant treatment for safety evaluation was 59.8 months and 59.6 months for patients receiving ARIMIDEX 1 mg and tamoxifen 20 mg, respectively.

Adverse events occurring with an incidence of at least 5% in either treatment group during treatment or within 14 days of the end of treatment are presented in Table 8.

Table 8 -Adverse events occurring with an incidence of at least 5% in either treatment group during treatment, or within 14 days of the end of treatment
*
§
*
COSTART Coding Symbols for Thesaurus of Adverse Reaction Terms.
N = Number of patients receiving the treatment.
*A patient may have had more than 1 adverse event, including more than 1 adverse event in the same body system.
§
Vaginal Hemorrhage without further diagnosis.
** The combination arm was discontinued due to lack of efficacy benefit at 33 months of follow-up.

Body system and adverse event by

COSTART-preferred term*

ARIMIDEX

1 mg

(N = 3092)

Tamoxifen

20 mg

(N = 3094)

Body as a whole

Asthenia

575 (19)

544 (18)

Pain

533 (17)

485 (16)

Back pain

321 (10)

309 (10)

Headache

314 (10)

249 (8)

Abdominal pain

271 (9)

276 (9)

Infection

285 (9)

276 (9)

Accidental injury

311 (10)

303 (10)

Flu syndrome

175 (6)

195 (6)

Chest pain

200 (7)

150 (5)

Neoplasm

162 (5)

144 (5)

Cyst

138 (5)

162 (5)

Cardiovascular

Vasodilatation

1104 (36)

1264 (41)

Hypertension

402 (13)

349 (11)

Digestive

Nausea

343 (11)

335 (11)

Constipation

249 (8)

252 (8)

Diarrhea

265 (9)

216 (7)

Dyspepsia

206 (7)

169 (6)

Gastrointestinal disorder

210 (7)

158 (5)

Hemic and lymphatic

Lymphoedema

304 (10)

341 (11)

Anemia

113 (4)

159 (5)

Metabolic and nutritional

Peripheral edema

311 (10)

343 (11)

Weight gain

285 (9)

274 (9)

Hypercholesterolemia

278 (9)

108 (3.5)

Musculoskeletal

Arthritis

512 (17)

445 (14)

Arthralgia

467 (15)

344 (11)

Osteoporosis

325 (11)

226 (7)

Fracture

315 (10)

209 (7)

Bone pain

201 (7)

185 (6)

Arthrosis

207 (7)

156 (5)

Joint Disorder

184 (6)

160 (5)

Myalgia

179 (6)

160 (5)

Nervous system

Depression

413 (13)

382 (12)

Insomnia

309 (10)

281 (9)

Dizziness

236 (8)

234 (8)

Anxiety

195 (6)

180 (6)

Paraesthesia

215 (7)

145 (5)

Respiratory

Pharyngitis

443 (14)

422 (14)

Cough increased

261 (8)

287 (9)

Dyspnea

234 (8)

237 (8)

Sinusitis

184 (6)

159 (5)

Bronchitis

167 (5)

153 (5)

Skin and appendages

Rash

333 (11)

387 (13)

Sweating

145 (5)

177 (6)

Special Senses

Cataract Specified

182 (6)

213 (7)

Urogenital

Leukorrhea

86 (3)

286 (9)

Urinary tract infection

244 (8)

313 (10)

Breast pain

251 (8)

169 (6)

Breast Neoplasm

164 (5)

139 (5)

Vulvovaginitis

194 (6)

150 (5)

Vaginal Hemorrhage

122 (4)

180 (6)

Vaginitis

125 (4)

158 (5)

Certain adverse events and combinations of adverse events were prospectively specified for analysis, based on the known pharmacologic properties and side effect profiles of the two drugs (See table 9).

Table 9 — Number of Patients with Pre-specified Adverse Event in ATAC Trial1*

ARIMIDEX N=3092

(%)

Tamoxifen

N=3094

(%)

Odds-ratio

95% CI

*
*
1Patients with multiple events in the same category are counted only once in that category.
2Refers to joint symptoms, including joint disorder, arthritis, arthrosis and arthralgia.
3 The observed difference was associated with a sub-group of patients with pre-existing ischemic heart disease
§
4 Percentages calculated based upon the numbers of patients with an intact uterus as baseline

Hot Flashes

1104 (36)

1264 (41)

0.80

0.73 − 0.89

Musculoskeletal Events2

1100 (36)

911 (29)

1.32

1.19 − 1.47

Fatigue/Asthenia

575 (19)

544 (18)

1.07

0.94 − 1.22

Mood Disturbances

597 (19)

554 (18)

1.10

0.97 − 1.25

Nausea and Vomiting

393 (13)

384 (12)

1.03

0.88 − 1.19

All Fractures

315 (10)

209 (7)

1.57

1.30 − 1.88

Fractures of Spine, Hip, or Wrist

133 (4)

91 (3)

1.48

1.13 − 1.95

Wrist/Colles’ fractures

67 (2)

50 (2)

Spine fractures

43 (1)

22 (1)

Hip fractures

28 (1)

26 (1)

Cataracts

182 (6)

213 (7)

0.85

0.69 − 1.04

Vaginal Bleeding

167 (5)

317 (10)

0.50

0.41 − 0.61

Ischemic Cardiovascular Disease3

127 (4)

104 (3)

1.23

0.95 − 1.60

Vaginal Discharge

109 (4)

408 (13)

0.24

0.19 − 0.30

Venous Thromboembolic events

87 (3)

140 (5)

0.61

0.47 − 0.80

Deep Venous Thromboembolic Events

48 (2)

74 (2)

0.64

0.45 − 0.93

Ischemic Cerebrovascular Event

62 (2)

88 (3)

0.70

0.50 − 0.97

Endometrial Cancer4§

4 (0.2)

13 (0.6)

0.31

0.10 − 0.94

Patients receiving ARIMIDEX had an increase in joint disorders (including arthritis, arthrosis and arthralgia) compared with patients receiving tamoxifen. Patients receiving ARIMIDEX had an increase in the incidence of all fractures (specifically fractures of spine, hip and wrist) [315 (10%)] compared with patients receiving tamoxifen [209 (7%)]. Patients receiving ARIMIDEX had a decrease in hot flashes, vaginal bleeding, vaginal discharge, endometrial cancer, venous thromboembolic events and ischemic cerebrovascular events compared with patients receiving tamoxifen.

Patients receiving ARIMIDEX had an increase in hypercholesterolemia (278 [9%]) compared to patients receiving tamoxifen (108 [3.5%]). Angina pectoris was reported in 71 [2.3%] patients in the ARIMIDEX arm and 51 [1.6%] patients in the tamoxifen arm; myocardial infarction was reported in 37 [1.2%] patients in the ARIMIDEX arm and in 34 [1.1%] patients in the tamoxifen arm.

Results from the ATAC trial bone substudy at 12 and 24 months demonstrated that patients receiving ARIMIDEX had a mean decrease in both lumbar spine and total hip bone mineral density (BMD) compared to baseline. Patients receiving tamoxifen had a mean increase in both lumbar spine and total hip BMD compared to baseline.

First Line Therapy

ARIMIDEX was generally well tolerated in two well-controlled clinical trials (ie, Trials 0030 and 0027). Adverse events occurring with an incidence of at least 5% in either treatment group of trials 0030 and 0027 during or within 2 weeks of the end of treatment are shown in Table 10.

Table 10
*
*
aA patient may have had more than 1 adverse event.

Body system Adverse eventa

Number (%) of subjects

ARIMIDEX

(n=506)

Tamoxifen

(n=511)

Whole body

Asthenia

83 (16)

81 (16)

Pain

70 (14)

73 (14)

Back pain

60 (12)

68 (13)

Headache

47   (9)

40   (8)

Abdominal pain

40   (8)

38   (7)

Chest pain

37   (7)

37   (7)

Flu syndrome

35   (7)

30   (6)

Pelvic pain

23   (5)

30   (6)

Cardiovascular

Vasodilation

128 (25)

106 (21)

Hypertension

25   (5)

36   (7)

Digestive

Nausea

94 (19)

106 (21)

Constipation

47   (9)

66 (13)

Diarrhea

40   (8)

33   (6)

Vomiting

38   (8)

36   (7)

Anorexia

26   (5)

46   (9)

Metabolic and Nutritional

Peripheral edema

51 (10)

41   (8)

Muscoloskeletal

Bone pain

54  (11)

52 (10)

Nervous

Dizziness

30   (6)

22   (4)

Insomnia

30   (6)

38   (7)

Depression

23   (5)

32   (6)

Hypertonia

16   (3)

26   (5)

Respiratory

Cough increased

55  (11)

52 (10)

Dyspnea

51  (10)

47   (9)

Pharyngitis

49  (10)

68 (13)

Skin and appendages

Rash

38   (8)

34   (8)

Urogenital

Leukorrhea

9   (2)

31   (6)

Less frequent adverse experiences reported in patients receiving ARIMIDEX l mg in either Trial 0030 or Trial 0027 were similar to those reported for second-line therapy.

Based on results from second-line therapy and the established safety profile of tamoxifen, the incidences of 9 prespecified adverse event categories potentially causally related to one or both of the therapies because of their pharmacology were statistically analyzed. No significant differences were seen between treatment groups.

Table 11
*
*
a A patient may have had more than 1 adverse event
bIncludes pulmonary embolus, thrombophlebitis, retinal vein thrombosis
cIncludes myocardial infarction, myocardial ischemia, angina pectoris, cerebrovascular accident, cerebral ischemia and cerebral infarct

Number (n) and Percentage of Patients

ARIMIDEX

1 mg

(n = 506)

NOLVADEX

20 mg

(n = 511)

Adverse Event Groupa

n  (%)

n  (%)

Depression

23  (5)

32  (6)

Tumor Flare

15  (3)

18  (4)

Thromboembolic Diseasea

18  (4)

33  (6)

Venousb

5

15

Coronary and Cerebralc

13

19

Gastrointestinal Disturbance

170 (34)

196 (38)

Hot Flushes

134 (26)

118 (23)

Vaginal Dryness

9    (2)

3     (1)

Lethargy

6     (1)

15   (3)

Vaginal Bleeding

5     (1)

11   (2)

Weight Gain

11   (2)

8     (2)

Despite the lack of estrogenic activity for ARIMIDEX, there was no increase in myocardial infarction or fracture when compared with tamoxifen.

Second Line Therapy

ARIMIDEX was generally well tolerated in two well-controlled clinical trials (ie, Trials 0004 and 0005), with less than 3.3% of the ARIMIDEX-treated patients and 4.0% of the megestrol acetate-treated patients withdrawing due to an adverse event.

The principal adverse event more common with ARIMIDEX than megestrol acetate was diarrhea. Adverse events reported in greater than 5% of the patients in any of the treatment groups in these two well-controlled clinical trials, regardless of causality, are presented below:

*
*
A patient may have more than one adverse event.

Adverse Event

ARIMIDEX

1 mg

(n = 262)

n %

ARIMIDEX

10 mg

(n = 246)

n%

Megesterol

Acetate

160 mg

(n = 253)

n%

Asthenia

42(16)

33(13)

47(19)

Nausea

41(16)

48(20)

28(11)

Headache

34(13)

44(18)

24(9)

Hot Flashes

32(12)

29(11)

21(8)

Pain

28(11)

38(15)

29(11)

Back Pain

28(11)

26(11)

19(8)

Dyspnea

24(9)

27(11)

53(21)

Vomiting

24(9)

26(11)

16(6)

Cough Increased

22(8)

18(7)

19(8)

Diarrhea

22(8)

18(7)

7(3)

Constipation

18(7)

18(7)

21(8)

Abdominal Pain

18(7)

14(6)

18(7)

Anorexia

18(7)

19(8)

11(4)

Bone Pain

17(6)

26(12)

19(8)

Pharyngitis

16(6)

23(9)

15(6)

Dizziness

16(6)

12(5)

15(6)

Rash

15(6)

15(6)

19(8)

Dry Mouth

15(6)

11(4)

13(5)

Peripheral Edema

14(5)

21(9)

28(11)

Pelvic Pain

14(5)

17(7)

13(5)

Depression

14(5)

6(2)

5(2)

Chest Pain

13(5)

18(7)

13(5)

Paresthesia

12(5)

15(6)

9(4)

Vaginal Hemorrhage

6(2)

4(2)

13(5)

Weight Gain

4(2)

9(4)

30(12)

Sweating

4(2)

3(1)

16(6)

Increased Appetite

0(0)

1(0)

13(5)

Other less frequent (2% to 5%) adverse experiences reported in patients receiving ARIMIDEX l mg in either Trial 0004 or Trial 0005 are listed below. These adverse experiences are listed by body system and are in order of decreasing frequency within each body system regardless of assessed causality.

Body as a Whole: Flu syndrome; fever; neck pain; malaise; accidental injury; infection

Cardiovascular: Hypertension; thrombophlebitis

Hepatic: Gamma GT increased; SGOT increased; SGPT increased

Hematologic: Anemia; leukopenia

Metabolic and Nutritional: Alkaline phosphatase increased; weight loss

Mean serum total cholesterol levels increased by 0.5 mmol/L among patients receiving ARIMIDEX. Increases in LDL cholesterol have been shown to contribute to these changes.

Musculoskeletal: Myalgia; arthralgia; pathological fracture

Nervous: Somnolence; confusion; insomnia; anxiety; nervousness

Respiratory: Sinusitis; bronchitis; rhinitis

Skin and Appendages:  Hair thinning; pruritus

Urogenital: Urinary tract infection; breast pain

The incidences of the following adverse event groups potentially causally related to one or both of the therapies because of their pharmacology, were statistically analyzed: weight gain, edema, thromboembolic disease, gastrointestinal disturbance, hot flushes, and vaginal dryness. These six groups, and the adverse events captured in the groups, were prospectively defined. The results are shown in the table below.

Table 13 - Number (n) and Percentage of Patients

Adverse Event Group

ARIMIDEX

1 mg

(n = 262)

n (%)

ARIMIDEX

10 mg

(n = 246)

n (%)

Megestrol Acetate

160 mg

(n = 253)

n (%)

Gastrointestinal Disturbance

77(29)

81(33)

54(21)

Hot Flushes

33(13)

29(12)

35(14)

Edema

19(7)

28(11)

35(14)

Thromboembolic Disease

9(3)

4(2)

12(5)

Vaginal Dryness

5(2)

3(1)

2(1)

Weight Gain

4(2)

10(4)

30(12)

More patients treated with megestrol acetate reported weight gain as an adverse event compared to patients treated with ARIMIDEX 1 mg (p<0.0001). Other differences were not statistically significant.

An examination of the magnitude of change in weight in all patients was also conducted. Thirty-four percent (87/253) of the patients treated with megestrol acetate experienced weight gain of 5% or more and 11% (27/253) of the patients treated with megestrol acetate experienced weight gain of 10% or more. Among patients treated with ARIMIDEX 1 mg, 13% [33/262] experienced weight gain of 5% or more and 3% [6/262] experienced weight gain of 10% or more. On average, this 5 to 10% weight gain represented between 6 and 12 pounds.

No patients receiving ARIMIDEX or megestrol acetate discontinued treatment due to drug-related weight gain.

Post-Marketing Experience

Hepatobiliary events including increases in alkaline phosphatase, alanine aminotransferase, and aspartate aminotransferase have been reported commonly (>1% and <10%) and gamma-GT, bilirubin and hepatitis have been reported uncommonly (> 0.1% and <1%) in patients receiving ARIMIDEX.

Vaginal bleeding has been reported infrequently, mainly in patients during the first few weeks after changing from existing hormonal therapy to treatment with ARIMIDEX. If bleeding persists, further evaluation should be considered.

During clinical trials and postmarketing experience joint pain/stiffness has been reported in association with the use of ARIMIDEX.

Carpal tunnel syndrome was reported more frequently in patients receiving ARIMIDEX than in those receiving tamoxifen in clinical trials; carpal tunnel has also been reported during post-marketing experience with ARIMIDEX. The majority of these reports occurred in patients with identifiable risk factors for the condition.

ARIMIDEX may also be associated with rash including very rare cases of mucocutaneous disorders such as erythema multiforme and Stevens-Johnson syndrome. Very rare cases of allergic reactions including angioedema, urticaria and anaphylaxis have been reported in patients receiving ARIMIDEX.

OVERDOSAGE

Clinical trials have been conducted with ARIMIDEX, up to 60 mg in a single dose given to healthy male volunteers and up to 10 mg daily given to postmenopausal women with advanced breast cancer; these dosages were well tolerated. A single dose of ARIMIDEX that results in life-threatening symptoms has not been established. In rats, lethality was observed after single oral doses that were greater than 100 mg/kg (about 800 times the recommended human dose on a mg/m2 basis) and was associated with severe irritation to the stomach (necrosis, gastritis, ulceration, and hemorrhage).

In an oral acute toxicity study in the dog the median lethal dose was greater than 45 mg/kg/day.

There is no specific antidote to overdosage and treatment must be symptomatic. In the management of an overdose, consider that multiple agents may have been taken. Vomiting may be induced if the patient is alert. Dialysis may be helpful because ARIMIDEX is not highly protein bound. General supportive care, including frequent monitoring of vital signs and close observation of the patient, is indicated.

DOSAGE AND ADMINISTRATION

The dose of ARIMIDEX is one 1 mg tablet taken once a day. For patients with advanced breast cancer, ARIMIDEX should be continued until tumor progression.

For adjuvant treatment of early breast cancer in postmenopausal women, the optimal duration of therapy is unknown. In the ATAC trial ARIMIDEX was administered for five years.

Patients with Hepatic Impairment

(See CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY) Hepatic metabolism accounts for approximately 85% of anastrozole elimination. Although clearance of anastrozole was decreased in patients with cirrhosis due to alcohol abuse, plasma anastrozole concentrations stayed in the usual range seen in patients without liver disease. Therefore, no changes in dose are recommended for patients with mild-to-moderate hepatic impairment, although patients should be monitored for side effects. ARIMIDEX has not been studied in patients with severe hepatic impairment.

Patients with Renal Impairment

No changes in dose are necessary for patients with renal impairment.

Use in the Elderly

No dosage adjustment is necessary.

HOW SUPPLIED

White, biconvex, film-coated tablets containing 1 mg of anastrozole. The tablets are impressed on one side with a logo consisting of a letter “A” (upper case) with an arrowhead attached to the foot of the extended right leg of the “A” and on the reverse with the tablet strength marking “Adx 1”. These tablets are supplied in bottles of 30 tablets (NDC 0310-0201-30).

Storage

Store at controlled room temperature, 20-25°C (68-77°F) [see USP].

AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP

Wilmington, Delaware 19850

Made in USA

All trademarks are the property of the AstraZeneca group

© AstraZeneca 2004, 2007

Rev 05–07 SIC No. 30261–02


ARIMIDEX (Anastrozole)
PRODUCT INFO
Product Code0310-0201Dosage FormTABLET
Route Of AdministrationORALDEA Schedule
INGREDIENTS
Name (Active Moiety)TypeStrength
Anastrozole (Anastrozole) Active1 MILLIGRAM  In 1 TABLET
lactoseInactive 
magnesium stearateInactive 
hydroxypropylmethylcelluloseInactive 
polyethylene glycolInactive 
povidoneInactive 
sodium starch glycolateInactive 
titanium dioxideInactive 
IMPRINT INFORMATION
CharacteristicAppearanceCharacteristicAppearance
ColorWHITEScore1
ShapeROUNDSymboltrue
Imprint Code Adx;1 Coatingtrue
Size6mm
PACKAGING
#NDCPackage DescriptionMultilevel Packaging
10310-0201-3030 TABLET In 1 BOTTLE, PLASTICNone

Revised: 07/2007AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP